Bird's Eye View Evaluation 2017


The bird's eye view benchmark consists of 7481 training images and 7518 test images as well as the corresponding point clouds, comprising a total of 80.256 labeled objects. For evaluation, we compute precision-recall curves. To rank the methods we compute average precision. We require that all methods use the same parameter set for all test pairs. Our development kit provides details about the data format as well as MATLAB / C++ utility functions for reading and writing the label files.

We evaluate bird's eye view detection performance using the PASCAL criteria also used for 2D object detection. Far objects are thus filtered based on their bounding box height in the image plane. As only objects also appearing on the image plane are labeled, objects in don't car areas do not count as false positives. We note that the evaluation does not take care of ignoring detections that are not visible on the image plane — these detections might give rise to false positives. For cars we require a bounding box overlap of 70% in bird's eye view, while for pedestrians and cyclists we require an overlap of 50%. Difficulties are defined as follows:

  • Easy: Min. bounding box height: 40 Px, Max. occlusion level: Fully visible, Max. truncation: 15 %
  • Moderate: Min. bounding box height: 25 Px, Max. occlusion level: Partly occluded, Max. truncation: 30 %
  • Hard: Min. bounding box height: 25 Px, Max. occlusion level: Difficult to see, Max. truncation: 50 %

All methods are ranked based on the moderately difficult results.

Note 2: On 08.10.2019, we have followed the suggestions of the Mapillary team in their paper Disentangling Monocular 3D Object Detection and use 40 recall positions instead of the 11 recall positions proposed in the original Pascal VOC benchmark. This results in a more fair comparison of the results, please check their paper. The last leaderboards right before this change can be found here: Object Detection Evaluation, 3D Object Detection Evaluation, Bird's Eye View Evaluation.
Important Policy Update: As more and more non-published work and re-implementations of existing work is submitted to KITTI, we have established a new policy: from now on, only submissions with significant novelty that are leading to a peer-reviewed paper in a conference or journal are allowed. Minor modifications of existing algorithms or student research projects are not allowed. Such work must be evaluated on a split of the training set. To ensure that our policy is adopted, new users must detail their status, describe their work and specify the targeted venue during registration. Furthermore, we will regularly delete all entries that are 6 months old but are still anonymous or do not have a paper associated with them. For conferences, 6 month is enough to determine if a paper has been accepted and to add the bibliography information. For longer review cycles, you need to resubmit your results.
Additional information used by the methods
  • Stereo: Method uses left and right (stereo) images
  • Flow: Method uses optical flow (2 temporally adjacent images)
  • Multiview: Method uses more than 2 temporally adjacent images
  • Laser Points: Method uses point clouds from Velodyne laser scanner
  • Additional training data: Use of additional data sources for training (see details)

Car


Method Setting Code Moderate Easy Hard Runtime Environment
1 VirConv-S code 93.52 % 95.99 % 90.38 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, S. Shi and C. Wang: Virtual Sparse Convolution for Multimodal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2023.
2 UDeerPEP code 93.40 % 95.34 % 89.07 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Dong, H. Ji, X. Huang, W. Zhang, X. Zhan and J. Chen: PeP: a Point enhanced Painting method for unified point cloud tasks. 2023.
3 VirConv-T code 92.65 % 96.11 % 89.69 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, S. Shi and C. Wang: Virtual Sparse Convolution for Multimodal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2023.
4 GraR-Po code 92.12 % 95.79 % 87.11 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Yang, Z. Liu, X. Wu, W. Wang, W. Qian, X. He and D. Cai: Graph R-CNN: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Semantic-Decorated Local Graph. ECCV 2022.
5 TSSTDet 92.11 % 95.80 % 89.23 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Hoang, D. Bui and M. Yoo: TSSTDet: Transformation-Based 3-D Object Detection via a Spatial Shape Transformer. IEEE Sensors Journal 2024.
6 MPCF 92.07 % 95.92 % 87.29 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
7 TED code 92.05 % 95.44 % 87.30 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, W. Li, R. Yang and C. Wang: Transformation-Equivariant 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. AAAI 2023.
8 MB3D 91.93 % 95.33 % 88.71 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
9 PVFusion code 91.87 % 95.01 % 86.96 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
10 VPFNet code 91.86 % 93.02 % 86.94 % 0.06 s 2 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhu, J. Deng, Y. Zhang, J. Ji, Q. Mao, H. Li and Y. Zhang: VPFNet: Improving 3D Object Detection with Virtual Point based LiDAR and Stereo Data Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2022.
11 SFD code 91.85 % 95.64 % 86.83 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Wu, L. Peng, H. Yang, L. Xie, C. Huang, C. Deng, H. Liu and D. Cai: Sparse Fuse Dense: Towards High Quality 3D Detection with Depth Completion. CVPR 2022.
12 SE-SSD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 91.84 % 95.68 % 86.72 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
W. Zheng, W. Tang, L. Jiang and C. Fu: SE-SSD: Self-Ensembling Single-Stage Object Detector From Point Cloud. CVPR 2021.
13 HDet3D 91.82 % 94.90 % 84.68 % 0.07 s >8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
14 LVP(84.92) 91.80 % 95.49 % 88.91 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
15 ACFNet 91.78 % 92.91 % 87.06 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Tian, X. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Xu, J. Wang, R. Ai, W. Gu and W. Ding: ACF-Net: Asymmetric Cascade Fusion for 3D Detection With LiDAR Point Clouds and Images. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2023.
16 GraR-Vo code 91.72 % 95.27 % 86.51 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Yang, Z. Liu, X. Wu, W. Wang, W. Qian, X. He and D. Cai: Graph R-CNN: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Semantic-Decorated Local Graph. ECCV 2022.
17 NIV-SSD 91.69 % 95.66 % 86.72 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
18 PVT-SSD 91.63 % 95.23 % 86.43 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Yang, W. Wang, M. Chen, B. Lin, T. He, H. Chen, X. He and W. Ouyang: PVT-SSD: Single-Stage 3D Object Detector with Point-Voxel Transformer. CVPR 2023.
19 HAF-PVP_test 91.60 % 95.33 % 86.71 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
20 SPANet 91.59 % 95.59 % 86.53 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Ye: SPANet: Spatial and Part-Aware Aggregation Network for 3D Object Detection. Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021.
21 CasA code 91.54 % 95.19 % 86.82 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
22 FEIF3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 91.53 % 95.29 % 86.87 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
23 LoGoNet code 91.52 % 95.48 % 87.09 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, T. Ma, Y. Hou, B. Shi, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Wu, Q. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Qiao and others: LoGoNet: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Local-to-Global Cross-Modal Fusion. CVPR 2023.
24 GraR-Pi code 91.52 % 95.06 % 86.42 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Yang, Z. Liu, X. Wu, W. Wang, W. Qian, X. He and D. Cai: Graph R-CNN: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Semantic-Decorated Local Graph. ECCV 2022.
25 MM-UniMODE 91.51 % 95.69 % 88.71 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
26 SCEMF 91.46 % 94.76 % 88.77 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
27 MAK_VOXEL_RCNN 91.46 % 95.32 % 86.81 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
28 UPIDet code 91.36 % 92.96 % 86.80 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Hou, Y. Yuan and G. Xing: Unleash the Potential of Image Branch for Cross-modal 3D Object Detection. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
29 BADet code 91.32 % 95.23 % 86.48 % 0.14 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
R. Qian, X. Lai and X. Li: BADet: Boundary-Aware 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. Pattern Recognition 2022.
30 Anonymous 91.30 % 95.26 % 86.73 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
31 ANM code 91.30 % 94.91 % 88.51 % ANM ANM
32 DEF-Model 91.28 % 93.03 % 86.48 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
33 SSLFusion 91.26 % 94.86 % 88.55 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
34 TED-S Reproduced 91.23 % 95.34 % 86.68 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
35 URFormer 91.22 % 94.40 % 86.35 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
36 CasA++ code 91.22 % 94.57 % 88.43 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
37 OGMMDet code 91.21 % 95.59 % 88.33 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
38 voxel_spark code 91.18 % 94.82 % 86.58 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
39 spark 91.13 % 94.93 % 86.54 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
40 3D HANet code 91.13 % 94.33 % 86.33 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Q. Xia, Y. Chen, G. Cai, G. Chen, D. Xie, J. Su and Z. Wang: 3D HANet: A Flexible 3D Heatmap Auxiliary Network for Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2023.
41 test 91.12 % 93.93 % 86.17 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
42 DiffCandiDet 91.11 % 95.05 % 86.45 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
43 spark_voxel_rcnn code 91.08 % 94.61 % 86.59 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
44 voxel-rcnn+++ code 91.06 % 92.84 % 86.27 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
45 SA-SSD code 91.03 % 95.03 % 85.96 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. He, H. Zeng, J. Huang, X. Hua and L. Zhang: Structure Aware Single-stage 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud. CVPR 2020.
46 L-AUG 91.00 % 94.52 % 88.08 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Cortinhal, I. Gouigah and E. Aksoy: Semantics-aware LiDAR-Only Pseudo Point Cloud Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
47 TED_S_baseline code 90.98 % 94.56 % 86.41 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
48 spark2 90.95 % 92.93 % 86.44 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
49 HS-fusion 90.95 % 93.77 % 87.79 % - s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
50 Voxel_Spark_focal_we code 90.93 % 94.83 % 86.45 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
51 c2f 90.89 % 92.31 % 86.25 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
52 3D Dual-Fusion code 90.86 % 93.08 % 86.44 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Kim, K. Park, M. Kim, D. Kum and J. Choi: 3D Dual-Fusion: Dual-Domain Dual-Query Camera-LiDAR Fusion for 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13529 2022.
53 PR-SSD 90.78 % 94.23 % 86.14 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
54 MLFusion-VS 90.78 % 95.10 % 88.41 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
55 GraphAlign(ICCV2023) code 90.73 % 94.46 % 88.34 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Song, H. Wei, L. Bai, L. Yang and C. Jia: GraphAlign: Enhancing accurate feature alignment by graph matching for multi-modal 3D object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2023.
56 GF-pointnet 90.67 % 93.88 % 86.09 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
57 SDGUFusion 90.65 % 95.10 % 86.45 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
58 MMLab PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 90.65 % 94.98 % 86.14 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, C. Guo, L. Jiang, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
59 SQD 90.63 % 95.44 % 88.04 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
60 focalnet 90.61 % 94.46 % 88.12 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
61 BPG3D 90.57 % 93.00 % 86.21 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
62 focalnet 90.56 % 94.52 % 88.08 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
63 VPFNet code 90.52 % 93.94 % 86.25 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. Wang, H. Chen and L. Fu: VPFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-class 3D Object Detection. 2021.
C. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Chen, P. Hsiao and L. Fu: VoPiFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2024.
64 ECA 90.50 % 93.87 % 85.94 % 0.08 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
65 PDV code 90.48 % 94.56 % 86.23 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Hu, T. Kuai and S. Waslander: Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
66 LGNet-3classes code 90.44 % 94.98 % 86.06 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
67 Spark_PartA2_Soft_fo code 90.38 % 93.90 % 85.91 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
68 M3DeTR code 90.37 % 94.41 % 85.98 % n/a s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
T. Guan, J. Wang, S. Lan, R. Chandra, Z. Wu, L. Davis and D. Manocha: M3DeTR: Multi-representation, Multi- scale, Mutual-relation 3D Object Detection with Transformers. 2021.
69 VoTr-TSD code 90.34 % 94.03 % 86.14 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Mao, Y. Xue, M. Niu, H. Bai, J. Feng, X. Liang, H. Xu and C. Xu: Voxel Transformer for 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2021.
70 HA-PillarNet 90.33 % 94.29 % 85.99 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
71 Spark_partA22 90.23 % 92.61 % 85.89 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
72 DSA-PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 90.13 % 92.42 % 85.93 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Bhattacharyya, C. Huang and K. Czarnecki: SA-Det3D: Self-Attention Based Context-Aware 3D Object Detection. 2021.
73 LFT 90.12 % 95.83 % 85.06 % 0.1s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
74 XView 90.12 % 92.27 % 85.94 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Xie, G. Xu, D. Cai and X. He: X-view: Non-egocentric Multi-View 3D Object Detector. 2021.
75 SFA-GCL code 90.12 % 95.75 % 84.97 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
76 SFA-GCL(80) code 90.11 % 95.76 % 84.96 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
77 GraR-VoI code 90.10 % 95.69 % 86.85 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Yang, Z. Liu, X. Wu, W. Wang, W. Qian, X. He and D. Cai: Graph R-CNN: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Semantic-Decorated Local Graph. ECCV 2022.
78 CAT-Det 90.07 % 92.59 % 85.82 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Zhang, J. Chen and D. Huang: CAT-Det: Contrastively Augmented Transformer for Multi-modal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
79 3ONet 90.07 % 95.87 % 85.09 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Hoang and M. Yoo: 3ONet: 3-D Detector for Occluded Object Under Obstructed Conditions. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
80 SFA-GCL(80, k=4) code 90.04 % 95.67 % 84.91 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
81 focal 90.02 % 94.56 % 85.95 % 100 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
82 GeVo 90.02 % 92.45 % 85.86 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
83 spark-part2 90.01 % 93.82 % 85.89 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
84 SP_SECOND_IOU code 89.95 % 92.23 % 85.84 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
85 CG-SSD 89.93 % 94.26 % 85.76 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
86 Anonymous code 89.91 % 93.38 % 84.91 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
87 OFFNet 89.88 % 91.62 % 85.57 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
88 SVGA-Net 89.88 % 92.07 % 85.59 % 0.03s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. He, Z. Wang, H. Zeng, Y. Zeng and Y. Liu: SVGA-Net: Sparse Voxel-Graph Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. AAAI 2022.
89 EBM3DOD code 89.86 % 95.64 % 84.56 % 0.12 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
F. Gustafsson, M. Danelljan and T. Schön: Accurate 3D Object Detection using Energy- Based Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04634 2020.
90 CIA-SSD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 89.84 % 93.74 % 82.39 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
W. Zheng, W. Tang, S. Chen, L. Jiang and C. Fu: CIA-SSD: Confident IoU-Aware Single-Stage Object Detector From Point Cloud. AAAI 2021.
91 MLF-DET 89.82 % 93.38 % 84.78 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Lin, Y. Shen, S. Zhou, S. Chen and N. Zheng: MLF-DET: Multi-Level Fusion for Cross- Modal 3D Object Detection. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks 2023.
92 CLOCs_PVCas code 89.80 % 93.05 % 86.57 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: CLOCs: Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection . 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020.
93 VoxelFSD 89.79 % 92.57 % 85.77 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
94 GLENet-VR code 89.76 % 93.48 % 84.89 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Z. Zhu, J. Hou and Y. Yuan: GLENet: Boosting 3D object detectors with generative label uncertainty estimation. International Journal of Computer Vision 2023.
Y. Zhang, J. Hou and Y. Yuan: A Comprehensive Study of the Robustness for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detectors against Adversarial Attacks. International Journal of Computer Vision 2023.
95 RDIoU code 89.75 % 94.90 % 84.67 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Sheng, S. Cai, N. Zhao, B. Deng, J. Huang, X. Hua, M. Zhao and G. Lee: Rethinking IoU-based Optimization for Single- stage 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
96 PV-RCNN-Plus 89.75 % 91.93 % 85.77 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
97 SFA-GCL(baseline) code 89.74 % 95.55 % 84.63 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
98 SFA-GCL_dataaug code 89.73 % 93.44 % 84.60 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
99 SFA-GCL code 89.71 % 93.53 % 84.58 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
100 DGEnhCL code 89.66 % 95.21 % 84.53 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
101 EBM3DOD baseline code 89.63 % 95.44 % 84.34 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
F. Gustafsson, M. Danelljan and T. Schön: Accurate 3D Object Detection using Energy- Based Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04634 2020.
102 SCNet3D 89.61 % 93.36 % 84.78 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
103 VPA 89.61 % 95.46 % 86.81 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
104 MAK code 89.59 % 93.21 % 86.84 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
105 pointpillars_spark code 89.57 % 92.98 % 84.91 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
106 3D-CVF at SPA
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 89.56 % 93.52 % 82.45 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Yoo, Y. Kim, J. Kim and J. Choi: 3D-CVF: Generating Joint Camera and LiDAR Features Using Cross-View Spatial Feature Fusion for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2020.
107 OcTr 89.56 % 93.08 % 86.74 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
C. Zhou, Y. Zhang, J. Chen and D. Huang: OcTr: Octree-based Transformer for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2023.
108 Struc info fusion II 89.54 % 95.26 % 82.31 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
P. An, J. Liang, J. Ma, K. Yu and B. Fang: Struc info fusion. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
109 spark_second_focal_w 89.53 % 91.19 % 85.11 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
110 spark_second code 89.53 % 91.23 % 85.02 % . s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
111 PSMS-Net
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 89.53 % 95.32 % 86.71 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
112 IIOU code 89.52 % 92.90 % 84.56 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
113 spark_pointpillar code 89.51 % 93.58 % 85.03 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
114 SASA
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 89.51 % 92.87 % 86.35 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
C. Chen, Z. Chen, J. Zhang and D. Tao: SASA: Semantics-Augmented Set Abstraction for Point-based 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01976 2022.
115 Fast-CLOCs 89.49 % 93.03 % 86.40 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: Fast-CLOCs: Fast Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2022.
116 IA-SSD (single) code 89.48 % 93.14 % 84.42 % 0.013 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
117 KPTr 89.48 % 92.74 % 84.50 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
118 CLOCs code 89.48 % 92.91 % 86.42 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: CLOCs: Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection . 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020.
119 PA3DNet 89.46 % 93.11 % 84.60 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Wang, L. Zhao and Y. Yue: PA3DNet: 3-D Vehicle Detection with Pseudo Shape Segmentation and Adaptive Camera- LiDAR Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2023.
120 PG-RCNN code 89.46 % 93.39 % 86.54 % 0.06 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
I. Koo, I. Lee, S. Kim, H. Kim, W. Jeon and C. Kim: PG-RCNN: Semantic Surface Point Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
121 DFAF3D 89.45 % 93.14 % 84.22 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Tang, X. Bai, J. Guo, B. Pan and W. Jiang: DFAF3D: A dual-feature-aware anchor-free single-stage 3D detector for point clouds. Image and Vision Computing 2023.
122 DVF-V 89.42 % 93.12 % 86.50 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Mahmoud, J. Hu and S. Waslander: Dense Voxel Fusion for 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
123 Struc info fusion I 89.38 % 94.91 % 84.29 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
P. An, J. Liang, J. Ma, K. Yu and B. Fang: Struc info fusion. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
124 BtcDet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 89.34 % 92.81 % 84.55 % 0.09 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhong and U. Neumann: Behind the Curtain: Learning Occluded Shapes for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2022.
125 IA-SSD (multi) code 89.33 % 92.79 % 84.35 % 0.014 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
126 GSG-FPS code 89.32 % 92.77 % 84.27 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
127 spark_second2 89.27 % 90.94 % 84.85 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
128 ACDet code 89.21 % 92.87 % 85.80 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Xu, G. Wang, X. Zhang and G. Wan: ACDet: Attentive Cross-view Fusion for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection. 3DV 2022.
129 DVF-PV 89.20 % 93.08 % 86.28 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Mahmoud, J. Hu and S. Waslander: Dense Voxel Fusion for 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
130 Test_dif code 89.20 % 92.69 % 84.23 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
131 STD code 89.19 % 94.74 % 86.42 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: STD: Sparse-to-Dense 3D Object Detector for Point Cloud. ICCV 2019.
132 FIRM-Net 89.18 % 92.56 % 86.33 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
133 Point-GNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 89.17 % 93.11 % 83.90 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Shi and R. Rajkumar: Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloud. CVPR 2020.
134 HMFI code 89.17 % 93.04 % 86.37 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, B. Shi, Y. Hou, X. Wu, T. Ma, Y. Li and L. He: Homogeneous Multi-modal Feature Fusion and Interaction for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
135 sec_spark code 89.16 % 90.89 % 84.84 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
136 SSL-PointGNN code 89.16 % 92.92 % 83.99 % 0.56 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
E. Erçelik, E. Yurtsever, M. Liu, Z. Yang, H. Zhang, P. Topçam, M. Listl, Y. Çaylı and A. Knoll: 3D Object Detection with a Self-supervised Lidar Scene Flow Backbone. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.00705 2022.
137 SPG_mini
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 89.12 % 92.80 % 86.27 % 0.09 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, C. Qi and D. Anguelov: SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generation. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (ICCV) 2021.
138 EQ-PVRCNN code 89.09 % 94.55 % 86.42 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, L. Jiang, Y. Sun, B. Schiele and J. Jia: A Unified Query-based Paradigm for Point Cloud Understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022.
139 VoxSeT code 89.07 % 92.70 % 86.29 % 33 ms 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. He, R. Li, S. Li and L. Zhang: Voxel Set Transformer: A Set-to-Set Approach to 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
140 RAFDet 89.07 % 92.64 % 85.96 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
141 RAFDet 89.05 % 92.29 % 84.35 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
142 3DSSD code 89.02 % 92.66 % 85.86 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu and J. Jia: 3DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detector. CVPR 2020.
143 RagNet3D code 89.01 % 92.87 % 86.36 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
144 EPNet++ 89.00 % 95.41 % 85.73 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, T. Huang, B. Li, X. Chen, X. Wang and X. Bai: EPNet++: Cascade Bi-Directional Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
145 DDF 89.00 % 92.57 % 86.50 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
146 IOUFusion 89.00 % 92.47 % 84.10 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
147 Focals Conv code 89.00 % 92.67 % 86.33 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Chen, Y. Li, X. Zhang, J. Sun and J. Jia: Focal Sparse Convolutional Networks for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022.
148 RAFDet code 88.99 % 92.23 % 84.21 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
149 LGNet-Car code 88.98 % 92.83 % 86.26 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
150 USVLab BSAODet code 88.90 % 92.66 % 86.23 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
W. Xiao, Y. Peng, C. Liu, J. Gao, Y. Wu and X. Li: Balanced Sample Assignment and Objective for Single-Model Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2023.
151 bs 88.88 % 94.53 % 86.00 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
152 CZY_PPF_Net 88.88 % 94.68 % 86.15 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
153 H^23D R-CNN code 88.87 % 92.85 % 86.07 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Deng, W. Zhou, Y. Zhang and H. Li: From Multi-View to Hollow-3D: Hallucinated Hollow-3D R-CNN for 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2021.
154 Pyramid R-CNN 88.84 % 92.19 % 86.21 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Mao, M. Niu, H. Bai, X. Liang, H. Xu and C. Xu: Pyramid R-CNN: Towards Better Performance and Adaptability for 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2021.
155 CityBrainLab-CT3D code 88.83 % 92.36 % 84.07 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Sheng, S. Cai, Y. Liu, B. Deng, J. Huang, X. Hua and M. Zhao: Improving 3D Object Detection with Channel- wise Transformer. ICCV 2021.
156 Voxel R-CNN code 88.83 % 94.85 % 86.13 % 0.04 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Deng, S. Shi, P. Li, W. Zhou, Y. Zhang and H. Li: Voxel R-CNN: Towards High Performance Voxel-based 3D Object Detection . AAAI 2021.
157 HVNet 88.82 % 92.83 % 83.38 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
M. Ye, S. Xu and T. Cao: HVNet: Hybrid Voxel Network for LiDAR Based 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
158 AMVFNet code 88.82 % 92.68 % 86.18 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
159 GD-MAE 88.82 % 94.22 % 83.54 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Yang, T. He, J. Liu, H. Chen, B. Wu, B. Lin, X. He and W. Ouyang: GD-MAE: Generative Decoder for MAE Pre- training on LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2023.
160 SPG
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 88.70 % 94.33 % 85.98 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, C. Qi and D. Anguelov: SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generation. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (ICCV) 2021.
161 MG 88.66 % 92.64 % 83.61 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
162 SIENet code 88.65 % 92.38 % 86.03 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, Y. Yao, Z. Quan, W. Yang and J. Xie: SIENet: Spatial Information Enhancement Network for 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud. 2021.
163 P2V-RCNN 88.63 % 92.72 % 86.14 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, S. Luo, Z. Zhu, H. Dai, A. Krylov, Y. Ding and L. Shao: P2V-RCNN: Point to Voxel Feature Learning for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. IEEE Access 2021.
164 FromVoxelToPoint code 88.61 % 92.23 % 86.11 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: From Voxel to Point: IoU-guided 3D Object Detection for Point Cloud with Voxel-to- Point Decoder. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
165 RangeIoUDet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 88.59 % 92.28 % 85.83 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liang, Z. Zhang, M. Zhang, X. Zhao and S. Pu: RangeIoUDet: Range Image Based Real-Time 3D Object Detector Optimized by Intersection Over Union. CVPR 2021.
166 af 88.58 % 92.43 % 86.05 % 1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
167 RBEV-Voxel code 88.54 % 91.92 % 85.73 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
168 MFB3D 88.54 % 94.67 % 85.75 % 0.14 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
169 second_iou_baseline code 88.48 % 92.24 % 85.57 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
170 EPNet code 88.47 % 94.22 % 83.69 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
T. Huang, Z. Liu, X. Chen and X. Bai: EPNet: Enhancing Point Features with Image Semantics for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2020.
171 CenterNet3D 88.46 % 91.80 % 83.62 % 0.04 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Wang, B. Tian, Y. Ai, T. Xu, L. Chen and D. Cao: CenterNet3D:An Anchor free Object Detector for Autonomous Driving. 2020.
172 FARP-Net code 88.45 % 91.20 % 86.01 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
T. Xie, L. Wang, K. Wang, R. Li, X. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Yang, H. Liu and J. Li: FARP-Net: Local-Global Feature Aggregation and Relation-Aware Proposals for 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2023.
173 PUDet 88.42 % 92.68 % 83.70 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
174 RangeRCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 88.40 % 92.15 % 85.74 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liang, M. Zhang, Z. Zhang, X. Zhao and S. Pu: RangeRCNN: Towards Fast and Accurate 3D Object Detection with Range Image Representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.00206 2020.
175 second_iou_baseline 88.40 % 92.12 % 85.54 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
176 Patches
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 88.39 % 92.72 % 83.19 % 0.15 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz
J. Lehner, A. Mitterecker, T. Adler, M. Hofmarcher, B. Nessler and S. Hochreiter: Patch Refinement: Localized 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04093 2019.
177 3D IoU-Net 88.38 % 94.76 % 81.93 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, S. Luo, Z. Zhu, H. Dai, S. Krylov, Y. Ding and L. Shao: 3D IoU-Net: IoU Guided 3D Object Detector for Point Clouds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04962 2020.
178 StructuralIF 88.38 % 91.78 % 85.67 % 0.02 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Pei An: Deep structural information fusion for 3D object detection on LiDAR-camera system. Accepted in CVIU 2021.
179 PASS-PV-RCNN-Plus 88.37 % 92.17 % 85.75 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Anonymous: Leveraging Anchor-based LiDAR 3D Object Detection via Point Assisted Sample Selection. will submit to computer vision conference/journal 2024.
180 AAMVFNet code 88.36 % 92.31 % 85.81 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
181 CLOCs_SecCas 88.23 % 91.16 % 82.63 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: CLOCs: Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection. 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020.
182 UberATG-MMF
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 88.21 % 93.67 % 81.99 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
M. Liang*, B. Yang*, Y. Chen, R. Hu and R. Urtasun: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2019.
183 Patches - EMP
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 88.17 % 94.49 % 84.75 % 0.5 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Lehner, A. Mitterecker, T. Adler, M. Hofmarcher, B. Nessler and S. Hochreiter: Patch Refinement: Localized 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04093 2019.
184 SRDL 88.17 % 92.01 % 85.43 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
185 Res3DNet 88.16 % 91.71 % 84.85 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
186 P2P code 88.15 % 91.92 % 81.12 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
187 PointPainting
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 88.11 % 92.45 % 83.36 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Vora, A. Lang, B. Helou and O. Beijbom: PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
188 SERCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 88.10 % 94.11 % 83.43 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
D. Zhou, J. Fang, X. Song, L. Liu, J. Yin, Y. Dai, H. Li and R. Yang: Joint 3D Instance Segmentation and Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2020.
189 PartA2_basline code 88.09 % 92.35 % 85.42 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
190 Associate-3Ddet code 88.09 % 91.40 % 82.96 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Du, X. Ye, X. Tan, J. Feng, Z. Xu, E. Ding and S. Wen: Associate-3Ddet: Perceptual-to-Conceptual Association for 3D Point Cloud Object Detection. The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020.
191 HotSpotNet 88.09 % 94.06 % 83.24 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Chen, L. Sun, Z. Wang, K. Jia and A. Yuille: object as hotspots. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2020.
192 Faraway-Frustum
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 88.08 % 91.90 % 85.35 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhang, D. Yang, E. Yurtsever, K. Redmill and U. Ozguner: Faraway-frustum: Dealing with lidar sparsity for 3D object detection using fusion. 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2021.
193 SFEBEV 88.08 % 93.44 % 83.01 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
194 pointpillar_spark_fo 88.02 % 92.48 % 84.82 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
195 UberATG-HDNET
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 87.98 % 93.13 % 81.23 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
B. Yang, M. Liang and R. Urtasun: HDNET: Exploiting HD Maps for 3D Object Detection. 2nd Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2018.
196 spark_pointpillar2 87.93 % 92.74 % 84.70 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
197 BAPartA2S-4h 87.89 % 91.96 % 83.31 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
198 Fast Point R-CNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 87.84 % 90.87 % 80.52 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Chen, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: Fast Point R-CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV) 2019.
199 MMLab-PartA^2
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 87.79 % 91.70 % 84.61 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Network. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2020.
200 SIF 87.76 % 91.44 % 85.15 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
P. An: SIF. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
201 MVAF-Net code 87.73 % 91.95 % 85.00 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
G. Wang, B. Tian, Y. Zhang, L. Chen, D. Cao and J. Wu: Multi-View Adaptive Fusion Network for 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.00652 2020.
202 DVFENet 87.68 % 90.93 % 84.60 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. He, G. Xia, Y. Luo, L. Su, Z. Zhang, W. Li and P. Wang: DVFENet: Dual-branch Voxel Feature Extraction Network for 3D Object Detection. Neurocomputing 2021.
203 S-AT GCN 87.68 % 90.85 % 84.20 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, C. Wang, X. Zhang, T. Lan and J. Li: S-AT GCN: Spatial-Attention Graph Convolution Network based Feature Enhancement for 3D Object Detection. CoRR 2021.
204 RangeDet (Official) code 87.67 % 90.93 % 82.92 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Fan, X. Xiong, F. Wang, N. Wang and Z. Zhang: RangeDet: In Defense of Range View for LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2021.
205 pointpillar_baseline code 87.61 % 92.52 % 83.84 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
206 Second_baseline code 87.60 % 90.94 % 84.36 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
207 VoxelFSD-S 87.60 % 90.94 % 84.11 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
208 SC-SSD 87.56 % 90.70 % 84.36 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
209 MODet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 87.56 % 90.80 % 82.69 % 0.05 s GTX1080Ti
Y. Zhang, Z. Xiang, C. Qiao and S. Chen: Accurate and Real-Time Object Detection Based on Bird's Eye View on 3D Point Clouds. 2019 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) 2019.
210 TF-PartA2 87.54 % 91.93 % 83.33 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
211 AB3DMOT
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 87.53 % 91.99 % 81.03 % 0.0047s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Weng and K. Kitani: A Baseline for 3D Multi-Object Tracking. arXiv:1907.03961 2019.
212 mm3d_PartA2 87.51 % 91.75 % 83.01 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
213 SeSame-point code 87.49 % 90.84 % 83.77 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
214 PointRGCN 87.49 % 91.63 % 80.73 % 0.26 s GPU @ V100 (Python)
J. Zarzar, S. Giancola and B. Ghanem: PointRGCN: Graph Convolution Networks for 3D Vehicles Detection Refinement. ArXiv 2019.
215 MGAF-3DSSD code 87.47 % 92.70 % 82.19 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: Anchor-free 3D Single Stage Detector with Mask-Guided Attention for Point Cloud. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
216 PC-CNN-V2
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 87.40 % 91.19 % 79.35 % 0.5 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Matlab + C/C++)
X. Du, M. Ang, S. Karaman and D. Rus: A General Pipeline for 3D Detection of Vehicles. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2018.
217 MMLab-PointRCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 87.39 % 92.13 % 82.72 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: Pointrcnn: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2019.
218 Sem-Aug
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 87.37 % 93.35 % 82.43 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Zhao, M. Wang and Y. Yue: Sem-Aug: Improving Camera-LiDAR Feature Fusion With Semantic Augmentation for 3D Vehicle Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2022.
219 MAFF-Net(DAF-Pillar) 87.34 % 90.79 % 77.66 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Zhang, Z. Liang, M. Zhang, X. Zhao, Y. Ming, T. Wenming and S. Pu: MAFF-Net: Filter False Positive for 3D Vehicle Detection with Multi-modal Adaptive Feature Fusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.10945 2020.
220 Harmonic PointPillar code 87.28 % 90.89 % 82.54 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhang, J. Mekala, Z. Nain, J. Park and H. Jung: 3D Harmonic Loss: Towards Task-consistent and Time-friendly 3D Object Detection for V2X Orchestration. will submit to IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2022.
221 PASS-PointPillar 87.23 % 91.07 % 81.98 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Anonymous: Leveraging Anchor-based LiDAR 3D Object Detection via Point Assisted Sample Selection. will submit to computer vision conference/journal 2024.
222 HRI-VoxelFPN 87.21 % 92.75 % 79.82 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Kuang, B. Wang, J. An, M. Zhang and Z. Zhang: Voxel-FPN:multi-scale voxel feature aggregation in 3D object detection from point clouds. sensors 2020.
223 epBRM
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 87.13 % 90.70 % 81.92 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
K. Shin: Improving a Quality of 3D Object Detection by Spatial Transformation Mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04853 2019.
224 LVFSD 87.12 % 90.42 % 83.91 % 0.06 s
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
225 XT-PartA2 87.08 % 90.89 % 82.70 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
226 centerpoint_pcdet 87.04 % 90.04 % 83.32 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
227 SARPNET 86.92 % 92.21 % 81.68 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Ye, H. Chen, C. Zhang, X. Hao and Z. Zhang: SARPNET: Shape Attention Regional Proposal Network for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection. Neurocomputing 2019.
228 SeSame-pillar code 86.88 % 90.61 % 81.93 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
229 ARPNET 86.81 % 90.06 % 79.41 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Ye, C. Zhang and X. Hao: ARPNET: attention region proposal network for 3D object detection. Science China Information Sciences 2019.
230 C-GCN 86.78 % 91.11 % 80.09 % 0.147 s GPU @ V100 (Python)
J. Zarzar, S. Giancola and B. Ghanem: PointRGCN: Graph Convolution Networks for 3D Vehicles Detection Refinement. ArXiv 2019.
231 PointPillars
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 86.56 % 90.07 % 82.81 % 16 ms 1080ti GPU and Intel i7 CPU
A. Lang, S. Vora, H. Caesar, L. Zhou, J. Yang and O. Beijbom: PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Clouds. CVPR 2019.
232 TANet code 86.54 % 91.58 % 81.19 % 0.035s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liu, X. Zhao, T. Huang, R. Hu, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: TANet: Robust 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds with Triple Attention. AAAI 2020.
233 PCNet3D 86.54 % 90.09 % 81.43 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
234 MEDL-U 86.50 % 91.75 % 79.29 % 1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
235 SCNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 86.48 % 90.07 % 81.30 % 0.04 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, H. Fu, L. Wang, L. Xiao and B. Dai: SCNet: Subdivision Coding Network for Object Detection Based on 3D Point Cloud. IEEE Access 2019.
236 MM_SECOND code 86.39 % 90.52 % 81.49 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
237 SegVoxelNet 86.37 % 91.62 % 83.04 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Yi, S. Shi, M. Ding, J. Sun, K. Xu, H. Zhou, Z. Wang, S. Li and G. Wang: SegVoxelNet: Exploring Semantic Context and Depth-aware Features for 3D Vehicle Detection from Point Cloud. ICRA 2020.
238 IIOU_LDR code 86.31 % 91.80 % 81.30 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
239 3D IoU Loss
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 86.22 % 91.36 % 81.20 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
D. Zhou, J. Fang, X. Song, C. Guan, J. Yin, Y. Dai and R. Yang: IoU Loss for 2D/3D Object Detection. International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) 2019.
240 VSAC 86.22 % 91.98 % 81.50 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
241 prcnn_v18_80_100 86.20 % 90.79 % 81.39 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
242 voxelnext_pcdet 86.15 % 89.72 % 82.34 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
243 ROT_S3D 86.11 % 91.33 % 81.17 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
244 SeSame-pillar w/scor code 86.11 % 90.43 % 81.38 % N/A s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
245 R50_SACINet 86.10 % 91.70 % 83.15 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
246 R-GCN 86.05 % 91.91 % 81.05 % 0.16 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Zarzar, S. Giancola and B. Ghanem: PointRGCN: Graph Convolution Networks for 3D Vehicles Detection Refinement. ArXiv 2019.
247 UberATG-PIXOR++
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 86.01 % 93.28 % 80.11 % 0.035 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
B. Yang, M. Liang and R. Urtasun: HDNET: Exploiting HD Maps for 3D Object Detection. 2nd Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2018.
248 HINTED 86.01 % 90.61 % 79.29 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
249 L_SACINet 85.99 % 91.21 % 81.05 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
250 Sem-Aug-PointRCNN++ 85.88 % 91.68 % 83.37 % 0.1 s 8 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
L. Zhao, M. Wang and Y. Yue: Sem-Aug: Improving Camera-LiDAR Feature Fusion With Semantic Augmentation for 3D Vehicle Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2022.
251 DASS 85.85 % 91.74 % 80.97 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
O. Unal, L. Van Gool and D. Dai: Improving Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation by Learning 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2021.
252 F-ConvNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 85.84 % 91.51 % 76.11 % 0.47 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Wang and K. Jia: Frustum ConvNet: Sliding Frustums to Aggregate Local Point-Wise Features for Amodal 3D Object Detection. IROS 2019.
253 SecAtten 85.84 % 91.32 % 82.57 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
254 PI-RCNN 85.81 % 91.44 % 81.00 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Xie, C. Xiang, Z. Yu, G. Xu, Z. Yang, D. Cai and X. He: PI-RCNN: An Efficient Multi-sensor 3D Object Detector with Point-based Attentive Cont-conv Fusion Module. AAAI 2020 : The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2020.
255 PointRGBNet 85.73 % 91.39 % 80.68 % 0.08 s 4 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Xie Desheng: Real-time Detection of 3D Objects Based on Multi-Sensor Information Fusion. Automotive Engineering 2022.
256 SeSame-voxel code 85.62 % 89.86 % 80.95 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
257 WA 85.61 % 90.76 % 79.99 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
258 UberATG-ContFuse
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 85.35 % 94.07 % 75.88 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
M. Liang, B. Yang, S. Wang and R. Urtasun: Deep Continuous Fusion for Multi-Sensor 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2018.
259 PFF3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 85.08 % 89.61 % 80.42 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Wen and K. Jo: Fast and Accurate 3D Object Detection for Lidar-Camera-Based Autonomous Vehicles Using One Shared Voxel-Based Backbone. IEEE Access 2021.
260 AVOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 84.95 % 89.75 % 78.32 % 0.08 s Titan X (pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
261 WS3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 84.93 % 90.96 % 77.96 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Meng, W. Wang, T. Zhou, J. Shen, L. Van Gool and D. Dai: Weakly Supervised 3D Object Detection from Lidar Point Cloud. 2020.
262 PI-SECOND code 84.83 % 90.15 % 79.86 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
263 ODGS 84.82 % 89.59 % 78.20 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
264 AVOD-FPN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 84.82 % 90.99 % 79.62 % 0.1 s Titan X (Pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
265 F-PointNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 84.67 % 91.17 % 74.77 % 0.17 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
C. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su and L. Guibas: Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08488 2017.
266 AEPF 84.63 % 89.99 % 80.02 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
267 mmFUSION code 84.60 % 90.35 % 79.82 % 1s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ahmad and A. Del Bue: mmFUSION: Multimodal Fusion for 3D Objects Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04058 2023.
268 3DBN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 83.94 % 89.66 % 76.50 % 0.13s 1080Ti (Python+C/C++)
X. Li, J. Guivant, N. Kwok and Y. Xu: 3D Backbone Network for 3D Object Detection. CoRR 2019.
269 EOTL code 83.14 % 89.10 % 71.41 % TBD s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
R. Yang, Z. Yan, T. Yang, Y. Wang and Y. Ruichek: Efficient Online Transfer Learning for Road Participants Detection in Autonomous Driving. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
270 MLOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 82.68 % 90.25 % 77.97 % 0.12 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Deng and K. Czarnecki: MLOD: A multi-view 3D object detection based on robust feature fusion method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04163 2019.
271 BirdNet+
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 81.85 % 87.43 % 75.36 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, J. Iglesias and F. García: BirdNet+: Two-Stage 3D Object Detection in LiDAR through a Sparsity-Invariant Bird’s Eye View. IEEE Access 2021.
272 DMF
This method uses stereo information.
 80.29 % 84.64 % 76.05 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. J. Chen and W. Xu: Disparity-Based Multiscale Fusion Network for Transportation Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2022.
273 UberATG-PIXOR
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 80.01 % 83.97 % 74.31 % 0.035 s TITAN Xp (Python)
B. Yang, W. Luo and R. Urtasun: PIXOR: Real-time 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. CVPR 2018.
274 MV3D (LIDAR)
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 78.98 % 86.49 % 72.23 % 0.24 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Chen, H. Ma, J. Wan, B. Li and T. Xia: Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Driving. CVPR 2017.
275 DSGN++
This method uses stereo information.
 code 78.94 % 88.55 % 69.74 % 0.2 s GeForce RTX 2080Ti
Y. Chen, S. Huang, S. Liu, B. Yu and J. Jia: DSGN++: Exploiting Visual-Spatial Relation for Stereo-Based 3D Detectors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
276 MV3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 78.93 % 86.62 % 69.80 % 0.36 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Chen, H. Ma, J. Wan, B. Li and T. Xia: Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Driving. CVPR 2017.
277 StereoDistill 78.59 % 89.03 % 69.34 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, X. Ye, X. Tan, D. Errui, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: StereoDistill: Pick the Cream from LiDAR for Distilling Stereo-based 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2023.
278 MMLAB LIGA-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 76.78 % 88.15 % 67.40 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Guo, S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: LIGA-Stereo: Learning LiDAR Geometry Aware Representations for Stereo-based 3D Detector. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2021.
279 RCD 75.83 % 82.26 % 69.61 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Bewley, P. Sun, T. Mensink, D. Anguelov and C. Sminchisescu: Range Conditioned Dilated Convolutions for Scale Invariant 3D Object Detection. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2020.
280 LaserNet 74.52 % 79.19 % 68.45 % 12 ms GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
G. Meyer, A. Laddha, E. Kee, C. Vallespi-Gonzalez and C. Wellington: LaserNet: An Efficient Probabilistic 3D Object Detector for Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019.
281 PL++ (SDN+GDC)
This method uses stereo information.
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 73.80 % 84.61 % 65.59 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. You, Y. Wang, W. Chao, D. Garg, G. Pleiss, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell and K. Weinberger: Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. International Conference on Learning Representations 2020.
282 SNVC
This method uses stereo information.
 code 73.61 % 86.88 % 64.49 % 1 s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
S. Li, Z. Liu, Z. Shen and K. Cheng: Stereo Neural Vernier Caliper. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2022.
283 A3DODWTDA
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 73.26 % 79.58 % 62.77 % 0.08 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
F. Gustafsson and E. Linder-Norén: Automotive 3D Object Detection Without Target Domain Annotations. 2018.
284 Complexer-YOLO
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 68.96 % 77.24 % 64.95 % 0.06 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (C/C++)
M. Simon, K. Amende, A. Kraus, J. Honer, T. Samann, H. Kaulbersch, S. Milz and H. Michael Gross: Complexer-YOLO: Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Tracking on Semantic Point Clouds. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops 2019.
285 TopNet-Retina
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 68.16 % 80.16 % 63.43 % 52ms GeForce 1080Ti (tensorflow-gpu, v1.12)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
286 SeSame-point w/score code 67.18 % 83.44 % 57.68 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
287 CG-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 66.44 % 85.29 % 58.95 % 0.57 s GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
C. Li, J. Ku and S. Waslander: Confidence Guided Stereo 3D Object Detection with Split Depth Estimation. IROS 2020.
288 PLUME
This method uses stereo information.
 66.27 % 82.97 % 56.70 % 0.15 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Wang, B. Yang, R. Hu, M. Liang and R. Urtasun: PLUME: Efficient 3D Object Detection from Stereo Images. IROS 2021.
289 CDN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 66.24 % 83.32 % 57.65 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
D. Garg, Y. Wang, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell, K. Weinberger and W. Chao: Wasserstein Distances for Stereo Disparity Estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 2020.
290 DSGN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 65.05 % 82.90 % 56.60 % 0.67 s NVIDIA Tesla V100
Y. Chen, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: DSGN: Deep Stereo Geometry Network for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
291 TopNet-DecayRate
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 64.60 % 79.74 % 58.04 % 92 ms NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
292 SeSame-voxel w/score code 63.36 % 71.98 % 57.52 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
293 BirdNet+ (legacy)
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 63.33 % 84.80 % 61.23 % 0.1 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, C. Guindel, J. Beltrán and F. García: BirdNet+: End-to-End 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Bird’s Eye View. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
294 3D FCN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 61.67 % 70.62 % 55.61 % >5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
B. Li: 3D Fully Convolutional Network for Vehicle Detection in Point Cloud. IROS 2017.
295 CDN-PL++
This method uses stereo information.
 61.04 % 81.27 % 52.84 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Garg, Y. Wang, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell, K. Weinberger and W. Chao: Wasserstein Distances for Stereo Disparity Estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2020.
296 BirdNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 59.83 % 84.17 % 57.35 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (Caffe)
J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, F. Moreno, D. Cruzado, F. García and A. Escalera: BirdNet: A 3D Object Detection Framework from LiDAR Information. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
297 TopNet-UncEst
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 59.67 % 72.05 % 51.67 % 0.09 s NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, M. Braun, M. Lauer and C. Stiller: Capturing Object Detection Uncertainty in Multi-Layer Grid Maps. 2019.
298 RT3D-GMP
This method uses stereo information.
 59.00 % 69.14 % 45.49 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Königshof and C. Stiller: Learning-Based Shape Estimation with Grid Map Patches for Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
299 Disp R-CNN (velo)
This method uses stereo information.
 code 58.62 % 79.76 % 47.73 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
300 ESGN
This method uses stereo information.
 58.12 % 78.10 % 49.28 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Gao, Y. Pang, J. Nie, Z. Shao, J. Cao, Y. Guo and X. Li: ESGN: Efficient Stereo Geometry Network for Fast 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2022.
301 Pseudo-LiDAR++
This method uses stereo information.
 code 58.01 % 78.31 % 51.25 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. You, Y. Wang, W. Chao, D. Garg, G. Pleiss, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell and K. Weinberger: Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. International Conference on Learning Representations 2020.
302 Disp R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 57.98 % 79.61 % 47.09 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
303 ZoomNet
This method uses stereo information.
 code 54.91 % 72.94 % 44.14 % 0.3 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Z. Xu: ZoomNet: Part-Aware Adaptive Zooming Neural Network for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2020.
304 VoxelJones code 53.96 % 66.21 % 47.66 % .18 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Motro and J. Ghosh: Vehicular Multi-object Tracking with Persistent Detector Failures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11306 2019.
305 TopNet-HighRes
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 53.05 % 67.84 % 46.99 % 101ms NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
306 OC Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 51.47 % 68.89 % 42.97 % 0.35 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Pon, J. Ku, C. Li and S. Waslander: Object-Centric Stereo Matching for 3D Object Detection. ICRA 2020.
307 YOLOStereo3D
This method uses stereo information.
 code 50.28 % 76.10 % 36.86 % 0.1 s GPU 1080Ti
Y. Liu, L. Wang and M. Liu: YOLOStereo3D: A Step Back to 2D for Efficient Stereo 3D Detection. 2021 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2021.
308 SST [st]
This method uses stereo information.
 47.07 % 71.08 % 41.90 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
309 RT3DStereo
This method uses stereo information.
 46.82 % 58.81 % 38.38 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Königshof, N. Salscheider and C. Stiller: Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving Using Stereo Vision and Semantic Information. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems 2019.
310 Pseudo-Lidar
This method uses stereo information.
 code 45.00 % 67.30 % 38.40 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Wang, W. Chao, D. Garg, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell and K. Weinberger: Pseudo-LiDAR From Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019.
311 BKDStereo3D code 44.02 % 70.19 % 32.78 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
312 RT3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 44.00 % 56.44 % 42.34 % 0.09 s GPU @ 1.8Ghz
Y. Zeng, Y. Hu, S. Liu, J. Ye, Y. Han, X. Li and N. Sun: RT3D: Real-Time 3-D Vehicle Detection in LiDAR Point Cloud for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2018.
313 Stereo CenterNet
This method uses stereo information.
 42.12 % 62.97 % 35.37 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi, Y. Guo, Z. Mi and X. Li: Stereo CenterNet-based 3D object detection for autonomous driving. Neurocomputing 2022.
314 Stereo R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 41.31 % 61.92 % 33.42 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
P. Li, X. Chen and S. Shen: Stereo R-CNN based 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. CVPR 2019.
315 BKDStereo3D w/o KD code 40.69 % 67.38 % 29.98 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
316 MonoTRKDv2 36.89 % 46.87 % 33.39 % 40 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
317 DA3D+KM3D+v2-99 34.88 % 44.27 % 30.29 % 0.120s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
318 CIE + DM3D 33.13 % 46.17 % 28.80 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Ananimities: Consistency of Implicit and Explicit Features Matters for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07933 2022.
319 StereoFENet
This method uses stereo information.
 32.96 % 49.29 % 25.90 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Bao, B. Xu and Z. Chen: MonoFENet: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Feature Enhancement Networks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2019.
320 MonoTAKD V2 32.31 % 43.83 % 28.48 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
321 error 30.78 % 49.96 % 26.51 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
322 monodetrnext-a 30.68 % 37.32 % 31.29 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
323 Mobile Stereo R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 28.78 % 44.51 % 22.30 % 1.8 s NVIDIA Jetson TX2
M. Hussein, M. Khalil and B. Abdullah: 3D Object Detection using Mobile Stereo R- CNN on Nvidia Jetson TX2. International Conference on Advanced Engineering, Technology and Applications (ICAETA) 2021.
324 DA3D+KM3D code 28.71 % 39.50 % 25.20 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
325 CIE 28.50 % 41.41 % 23.88 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Anonymities: Consistency of Implicit and Explicit Features Matters for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07933 2022.
326 monodetrnext-f 28.12 % 34.56 % 28.33 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
327 MonoTAKD 27.76 % 38.75 % 24.14 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
328 MonoLTKD 27.76 % 38.75 % 24.14 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
329 MonoLTKD_V3 27.75 % 38.75 % 24.13 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
330 DA3D 26.92 % 36.83 % 23.41 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
331 MonoLiG code 26.83 % 35.73 % 24.24 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Hekimoglu, M. Schmidt and A. Ramiro: Monocular 3D Object Detection with LiDAR Guided Semi Supervised Active Learning. 2023.
332 Sample code 26.21 % 35.31 % 22.28 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
333 MonoLSS 25.95 % 34.89 % 22.59 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, J. Jia and Y. Shi: MonoLSS: Learnable Sample Selection For Monocular 3D Detection. International Conference on 3D Vision 2024.
334 CMKD code 25.82 % 38.98 % 22.80 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Hong, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Cross-Modality Knowledge Distillation Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
335 Occlude3D code 25.41 % 33.08 % 20.75 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
336 PS-SVDM 24.82 % 38.18 % 20.89 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
337 LPCG-Monoflex code 24.81 % 35.96 % 21.86 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Peng, F. Liu, Z. Yu, S. Yan, D. Deng, Z. Yang, H. Liu and D. Cai: Lidar Point Cloud Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
338 NeurOCS 24.49 % 37.27 % 20.89 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Min, B. Zhuang, S. Schulter, B. Liu, E. Dunn and M. Chandraker: NeurOCS: Neural NOCS Supervision for Monocular 3D Object Localization. CVPR 2023.
339 Mix-Teaching code 24.23 % 35.74 % 20.80 % 30 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Wang, M. Zhu, C. Zhang and J. Li: Mix-Teaching: A Simple, Unified and Effective Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ArXiv 2022.
340 MonoAux-v2 code 24.15 % 34.14 % 20.84 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
341 MonoSKD code 24.08 % 37.12 % 20.37 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Wang and J. Zheng: MonoSKD: General Distillation Framework for Monocular 3D Object Detection via Spearman Correlation Coefficient. ECAI 2023.
342 MonoSample (DID-M3D) code 23.94 % 37.64 % 20.46 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Qiao, B. Liu, J. Yang, B. Wang, S. Xiu, X. Du and X. Nie: MonoSample: Synthetic 3D Data Augmentation Method in Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2024.
343 TBD 23.87 % 37.10 % 20.24 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
344 PS-fld code 23.76 % 32.64 % 20.64 % 0.25 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Chen, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Pseudo-Stereo for Monocular 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
345 MSFENet code 23.65 % 36.81 % 20.06 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
346 SHUD 23.63 % 36.39 % 20.01 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
347 ADD code 23.58 % 35.20 % 20.08 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wu, Y. Wu, J. Pu, X. Li and X. Wang: Attention-based Depth Distillation with 3D-Aware Positional Encoding for Monocular 3D Object Detection. AAAI2023 .
348 MonoNeRD code 23.46 % 31.13 % 20.97 % na s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Xu, L. Peng, H. Cheng, H. Li, W. Qian, K. Li, W. Wang and D. Cai: MonoNeRD: NeRF-like Representations for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2023.
349 MonoDDE 23.46 % 33.58 % 20.37 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, Z. Qu, Y. Zhou, J. Liu, H. Wang and L. Jiang: Diversity Matters: Fully Exploiting Depth Clues for Reliable Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
350 DD3D code 23.41 % 32.35 % 20.42 % n/a s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Park, R. Ambrus, V. Guizilini, J. Li and A. Gaidon: Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) .
351 MonoSGC 23.27 % 35.78 % 19.92 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
352 FDGNet code 23.27 % 36.25 % 19.56 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
353 MonoUNI code 23.05 % 33.28 % 19.39 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Jia, Z. Li and Y. Shi: MonoUNI: A Unified Vehicle and Infrastructure-side Monocular 3D Object Detection Network with Sufficient Depth Clues. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
354 MonoCD code 22.81 % 33.41 % 19.57 % n/a s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Yan, P. Yan, S. Xiong, X. Xiang and Y. Tan: MonoCD: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Complementary Depths. CVPR 2024.
355 MonoFRD 22.77 % 29.65 % 20.41 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
356 DID-M3D code 22.76 % 32.95 % 19.83 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Peng, X. Wu, Z. Yang, H. Liu and D. Cai: DID-M3D: Decoupling Instance Depth for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
357 OPA-3D code 22.53 % 33.54 % 19.22 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Su, Y. Di, G. Zhai, F. Manhardt, J. Rambach, B. Busam, D. Stricker and F. Tombari: OPA-3D: Occlusion-Aware Pixel-Wise Aggregation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2023.
358 MonoSTL 22.42 % 32.19 % 19.48 % na s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
359 MonoCDiT 21.97 % 30.32 % 18.80 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
360 BA2-Det+MonoFlex 21.54 % 31.61 % 18.35 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
361 DCD code 21.50 % 32.55 % 18.25 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Li, Y. Chen, J. He and Z. Zhang: Densely Constrained Depth Estimator for Monocular 3D Object Detection. European Conference on Computer Vision 2022.
362 MonoDETR code 21.45 % 32.20 % 18.68 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
R. Zhang, H. Qiu, T. Wang, X. Xu, Z. Guo, Y. Qiao, P. Gao and H. Li: MonoDETR: Depth-aware Transformer for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.13310 2022.
363 SGM3D code 21.37 % 31.49 % 18.43 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Zhou, L. Du, X. Ye, Z. Zou, X. Tan, L. Zhang, X. Xue and J. Feng: SGM3D: Stereo Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. RA-L 2022.
364 Cube R-CNN code 21.20 % 31.70 % 18.43 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil, A. Kumar, J. Straub, N. Ravi, J. Johnson and G. Gkioxari: Omni3D: A Large Benchmark and Model for 3D Object Detection in the Wild. CVPR 2023.
365 GUPNet code 21.19 % 30.29 % 18.20 % NA s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Lu, X. Ma, L. Yang, T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Q. Chu, J. Yan and W. Ouyang: Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13774 2021.
366 MonoSIM_v2 21.19 % 30.36 % 18.45 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
367 HomoLoss(monoflex) code 20.68 % 29.60 % 17.81 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Gu, B. Wu, L. Fan, J. Huang, S. Cao, Z. Xiang and X. Hua: Homography Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
368 DEVIANT code 20.44 % 29.65 % 17.43 % 0.04 s 1 GPU (Python)
A. Kumar, G. Brazil, E. Corona, A. Parchami and X. Liu: DEVIANT: Depth EquiVarIAnt NeTwork for Monocular 3D Object Detection. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2022.
369 MonoDTR 20.38 % 28.59 % 17.14 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Huang, T. Wu, H. Su and W. Hsu: MonoDTR: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Transformer. CVPR 2022.
370 MDSNet 20.14 % 32.81 % 15.77 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Xie, Y. Song, J. Wu, Z. Li, C. Song and Z. Xu: MDS-Net: Multi-Scale Depth Stratification 3D Object Detection from Monocular Images. Sensors 2022.
371 MonoSIM 20.09 % 28.68 % 18.28 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
372 AutoShape code 20.08 % 30.66 % 15.95 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Liu, D. Zhou, F. Lu, J. Fang and L. Zhang: AutoShape: Real-Time Shape-Aware Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021.
373 MonoFlex 19.75 % 28.23 % 16.89 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhang, J. Lu and J. Zhou: Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
374 MonoEF 19.70 % 29.03 % 17.26 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhou, Y. He, H. Zhu, C. Wang, H. Li and Q. Jiang: Monocular 3D Object Detection: An Extrinsic Parameter Free Approach. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
375 MonOAPC 19.67 % 28.91 % 16.99 % 0035 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, P. Han, X. Chai and Y. Qiu: Occlusion-Aware Plane-Constraints for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2023.
376 MonoDSSMs-M 19.59 % 28.29 % 16.34 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
377 MonoDSSMs-A 19.54 % 28.84 % 16.30 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
378 HomoLoss(imvoxelnet) code 19.25 % 29.18 % 16.21 % 0.20 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Gu, B. Wu, L. Fan, J. Huang, S. Cao, Z. Xiang and X. Hua: Homogrpahy Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
379 DFR-Net 19.17 % 28.17 % 14.84 % 0.18 s 1080 Ti (Pytorch)
Z. Zou, X. Ye, L. Du, X. Cheng, X. Tan, L. Zhang, J. Feng, X. Xue and E. Ding: The devil is in the task: Exploiting reciprocal appearance-localization features for monocular 3d object detection . ICCV 2021.
380 PS-SVDM 19.07 % 28.52 % 16.30 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
381 DLE code 19.05 % 31.09 % 14.13 % 0.06 s NVIDIA Tesla V100
C. Liu, S. Gu, L. Gool and R. Timofte: Deep Line Encoding for Monocular 3D Object Detection and Depth Prediction. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) 2021.
382 PCT code 19.03 % 29.65 % 15.92 % 0.045 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Z. Zhang, T. He, M. Li and X. Xue: Progressive Coordinate Transforms for Monocular 3D Object Detection. NeurIPS 2021.
383 CaDDN code 18.91 % 27.94 % 17.19 % 0.63 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Reading, A. Harakeh, J. Chae and S. Waslander: Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
384 monodle code 18.89 % 24.79 % 16.00 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Ma, Y. Zhang, D. Xu, D. Zhou, S. Yi, H. Li and W. Ouyang: Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021 .
385 Neighbor-Vote 18.65 % 27.39 % 16.54 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Chu, J. Deng, Y. Li, Z. Yuan, Y. Zhang, J. Ji and Y. Zhang: Neighbor-Vote: Improving Monocular 3D Object Detection through Neighbor Distance Voting. ACM MM 2021.
386 MonoRCNN++ code 18.62 % 27.20 % 15.69 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Shi, Z. Chen and T. Kim: Multivariate Probabilistic Monocular 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
387 GrooMeD-NMS code 18.27 % 26.19 % 14.05 % 0.12 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Kumar, G. Brazil and X. Liu: GrooMeD-NMS: Grouped Mathematically Differentiable NMS for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
388 MonoRCNN code 18.11 % 25.48 % 14.10 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Shi, Q. Ye, X. Chen, C. Chen, Z. Chen and T. Kim: Geometry-based Distance Decomposition for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2021.
389 Ground-Aware code 17.98 % 29.81 % 13.08 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Liu, Y. Yuan and M. Liu: Ground-aware Monocular 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2021.
390 Aug3D-RPN 17.89 % 26.00 % 14.18 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. He, J. Huang, X. Hua and L. Zhang: Aug3D-RPN: Improving Monocular 3D Object Detection by Synthetic Images with Virtual Depth. 2021.
391 DDMP-3D 17.89 % 28.08 % 13.44 % 0.18 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, L. Du, X. Ye, Y. Fu, G. Guo, X. Xue, J. Feng and L. Zhang: Depth-conditioned Dynamic Message Propagation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
392 IAFA 17.88 % 25.88 % 15.35 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Zhou, X. Song, Y. Dai, J. Yin, F. Lu, M. Liao, J. Fang and L. Zhang: IAFA: Instance-Aware Feature Aggregation for 3D Object Detection from a Single Image. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision 2020.
393 mdab 17.74 % 26.42 % 15.71 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
394 FMF-occlusion-net 17.60 % 27.39 % 13.25 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Wang, F. Sun and W. Huang: Fine-grained Multi-level Fusion for Anti- occlusion Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2022.
395 RefinedMPL 17.60 % 28.08 % 13.95 % 0.15 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Vianney, S. Aich and B. Liu: RefinedMPL: Refined Monocular PseudoLiDAR for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.09712 2019.
396 Kinematic3D code 17.52 % 26.69 % 13.10 % 0.12 s 1 core @ 1.5 Ghz (C/C++)
G. Brazil, G. Pons-Moll, X. Liu and B. Schiele: Kinematic 3D Object Detection in Monocular Video. ECCV 2020 .
397 MonoAuxNorm 17.38 % 23.43 % 14.74 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
398 MonoRUn code 17.34 % 27.94 % 15.24 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Chen, Y. Huang, W. Tian, Z. Gao and L. Xiong: MonoRUn: Monocular 3D Object Detection by Reconstruction and Uncertainty Propagation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
399 AM3D 17.32 % 25.03 % 14.91 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Ma, Z. Wang, H. Li, P. Zhang, W. Ouyang and X. Fan: Accurate Monocular Object Detection via Color- Embedded 3D Reconstruction for Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE international Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019.
400 YoloMono3D code 17.15 % 26.79 % 12.56 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Liu, L. Wang and L. Ming: YOLOStereo3D: A Step Back to 2D for Efficient Stereo 3D Detection. 2021 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2021.
401 CMAN 17.04 % 25.89 % 12.88 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Yuanzhouhan Cao: CMAN: Leaning Global Structure Correlation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2022.
402 GAC3D 16.93 % 25.80 % 12.50 % 0.25 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
M. Bui, D. Ngo, H. Pham and D. Nguyen: GAC3D: improving monocular 3D object detection with ground-guide model and adaptive convolution. 2021.
403 PatchNet code 16.86 % 22.97 % 14.97 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Ma, S. Liu, Z. Xia, H. Zhang, X. Zeng and W. Ouyang: Rethinking Pseudo-LiDAR Representation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2020.
404 PGD-FCOS3D code 16.51 % 26.89 % 13.49 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Wang, X. Zhu, J. Pang and D. Lin: Probabilistic and Geometric Depth: Detecting Objects in Perspective. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2021.
405 ImVoxelNet code 16.37 % 25.19 % 13.58 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
D. Rukhovich, A. Vorontsova and A. Konushin: ImVoxelNet: Image to Voxels Projection for Monocular and Multi-View General-Purpose 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01178 2021.
406 KM3D code 16.20 % 23.44 % 14.47 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
P. Li: Monocular 3D Detection with Geometric Constraints Embedding and Semi-supervised Training. 2020.
407 D4LCN code 16.02 % 22.51 % 12.55 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Ding, Y. Huo, H. Yi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, Z. Lu and P. Luo: Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
408 MonoAIU 15.68 % 23.01 % 12.87 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
409 mdab 15.09 % 23.18 % 13.38 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
410 MonoPair 14.83 % 19.28 % 12.89 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Chen, L. Tai, K. Sun and M. Li: MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationships. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020.
411 Decoupled-3D 14.82 % 23.16 % 11.25 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Cai, B. Li, Z. Jiao, H. Li, X. Zeng and X. Wang: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Decoupled Structured Polygon Estimation and Height-Guided Depth Estimation. AAAI 2020.
412 QD-3DT
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 14.71 % 20.16 % 12.76 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Hu, Y. Yang, T. Fischer, F. Yu, T. Darrell and M. Sun: Monocular Quasi-Dense 3D Object Tracking. ArXiv:2103.07351 2021.
413 SMOKE code 14.49 % 20.83 % 12.75 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, Z. Wu and R. Tóth: SMOKE: Single-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detection via Keypoint Estimation. 2020.
414 RTM3D code 14.20 % 19.17 % 11.99 % 0.05 s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
P. Li, H. Zhao, P. Liu and F. Cao: RTM3D: Real-time Monocular 3D Detection from Object Keypoints for Autonomous Driving. 2020.
415 Mono3D_PLiDAR code 13.92 % 21.27 % 11.25 % 0.1 s NVIDIA GeForce 1080 (pytorch)
X. Weng and K. Kitani: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Pseudo-LiDAR Point Cloud. arXiv:1903.09847 2019.
416 M3D-RPN code 13.67 % 21.02 % 10.23 % 0.16 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil and X. Liu: M3D-RPN: Monocular 3D Region Proposal Network for Object Detection . ICCV 2019 .
417 CSoR
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 13.07 % 18.67 % 10.34 % 3.5 s 4 cores @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Plotkin: PyDriver: Entwicklung eines Frameworks für räumliche Detektion und Klassifikation von Objekten in Fahrzeugumgebung. 2015.
418 mdab 12.67 % 18.79 % 10.41 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
419 MonoPSR code 12.58 % 18.33 % 9.91 % 0.2 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ku*, A. Pon* and S. Waslander: Monocular 3D Object Detection Leveraging Accurate Proposals and Shape Reconstruction. CVPR 2019.
420 Plane-Constraints code 12.06 % 17.31 % 10.05 % 0.05 s 4 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, X. Chai, Y. Qiu and P. Han: Vertex points are not enough: Monocular 3D object detection via intra-and inter-plane constraints. Neural Networks 2023.
421 MonoCInIS 11.64 % 22.28 % 9.95 % 0,13 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Heylen, M. De Wolf, B. Dawagne, M. Proesmans, L. Van Gool, W. Abbeloos, H. Abdelkawy and D. Reino: MonoCInIS: Camera Independent Monocular 3D Object Detection using Instance Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021.
422 SS3D 11.52 % 16.33 % 9.93 % 48 ms Tesla V100 (Python)
E. Jörgensen, C. Zach and F. Kahl: Monocular 3D Object Detection and Box Fitting Trained End-to-End Using Intersection-over-Union Loss. CoRR 2019.
423 mdab 11.47 % 17.81 % 9.08 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
424 MonoGRNet code 11.17 % 18.19 % 8.73 % 0.04s NVIDIA P40
Z. Qin, J. Wang and Y. Lu: MonoGRNet: A Geometric Reasoning Network for 3D Object Localization. The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-19) 2019.
425 MonoFENet 11.03 % 17.03 % 9.05 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Bao, B. Xu and Z. Chen: MonoFENet: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Feature Enhancement Networks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2019.
426 MonoCInIS 10.96 % 20.42 % 9.23 % 0,14 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Heylen, M. De Wolf, B. Dawagne, M. Proesmans, L. Van Gool, W. Abbeloos, H. Abdelkawy and D. Reino: MonoCInIS: Camera Independent Monocular 3D Object Detection using Instance Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021.
427 A3DODWTDA (image) code 8.66 % 10.37 % 7.06 % 0.8 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
F. Gustafsson and E. Linder-Norén: Automotive 3D Object Detection Without Target Domain Annotations. 2018.
428 TLNet (Stereo)
This method uses stereo information.
 code 7.69 % 13.71 % 6.73 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Qin, J. Wang and Y. Lu: Triangulation Learning Network: from Monocular to Stereo 3D Object Detection. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019.
429 Shift R-CNN (mono) code 6.82 % 11.84 % 5.27 % 0.25 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Naiden, V. Paunescu, G. Kim, B. Jeon and M. Leordeanu: Shift R-CNN: Deep Monocular 3D Object Detection With Closed-form Geometric Constraints. ICIP 2019.
430 SparVox3D 6.39 % 10.20 % 5.06 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
E. Balatkan and F. Kıraç: Improving Regression Performance on Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Bin-Mixing and Sparse Voxel Data. 2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) 2021.
431 GS3D 6.08 % 8.41 % 4.94 % 2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
B. Li, W. Ouyang, L. Sheng, X. Zeng and X. Wang: GS3D: An Efficient 3D Object Detection Framework for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019.
432 MVRA + I-FRCNN+ 5.84 % 9.05 % 4.50 % 0.18 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Choi, H. Kang and Y. Hyun: Multi-View Reprojection Architecture for Orientation Estimation. The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) Workshops 2019.
433 WeakM3D code 5.66 % 11.82 % 4.08 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Peng, S. Yan, B. Wu, Z. Yang, X. He and D. Cai: WeakM3D: Towards Weakly Supervised Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICLR 2022.
434 ROI-10D 4.91 % 9.78 % 3.74 % 0.2 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
F. Manhardt, W. Kehl and A. Gaidon: ROI-10D: Monocular Lifting of 2D Detection to 6D Pose and Metric Shape. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019.
435 3D-GCK 4.57 % 5.79 % 3.64 % 24 ms Tesla V100
N. Gählert, J. Wan, N. Jourdan, J. Finkbeiner, U. Franke and J. Denzler: Single-Shot 3D Detection of Vehicles from Monocular RGB Images via Geometrically Constrained Keypoints in Real-Time. 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2020.
436 FQNet 3.23 % 5.40 % 2.46 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Liu, J. Lu, C. Xu, Q. Tian and J. Zhou: Deep Fitting Degree Scoring Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2019.
437 3D-SSMFCNN code 2.63 % 3.20 % 2.40 % 0.1 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Novak: Vehicle Detection and Pose Estimation for Autonomous Driving. 2017.
438 VeloFCN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 0.14 % 0.02 % 0.21 % 1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
B. Li, T. Zhang and T. Xia: Vehicle Detection from 3D Lidar Using Fully Convolutional Network. RSS 2016 .
439 f3sd code 0.01 % 0.00 % 0.01 % 1.67 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
440 multi-task CNN 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 25.1 ms GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
M. Oeljeklaus, F. Hoffmann and T. Bertram: A Fast Multi-Task CNN for Spatial Understanding of Traffic Scenes. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference 2018.
441 mBoW
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Behley, V. Steinhage and A. Cremers: Laser-based Segment Classification Using a Mixture of Bag-of-Words. Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2013.
Table as LaTeX | Only published Methods

Pedestrian


Method Setting Code Moderate Easy Hard Runtime Environment
1 PiFeNet code 53.92 % 63.25 % 50.53 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Le, H. Shi, H. Rezatofighi and J. Cai: Accurate and Real-time 3D Pedestrian Detection Using an Efficient Attentive Pillar Network. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2022.
2 CasA++ code 53.84 % 60.14 % 51.35 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
3 TED code 53.48 % 60.13 % 50.89 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, W. Li, R. Yang and C. Wang: Transformation-Equivariant 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. AAAI 2023.
4 UPIDet code 53.32 % 58.91 % 50.82 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Hou, Y. Yuan and G. Xing: Unleash the Potential of Image Branch for Cross-modal 3D Object Detection. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
5 EQ-PVRCNN code 52.81 % 61.73 % 49.87 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, L. Jiang, Y. Sun, B. Schiele and J. Jia: A Unified Query-based Paradigm for Point Cloud Understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022.
6 VPFNet code 52.41 % 60.07 % 50.28 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. Wang, H. Chen and L. Fu: VPFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-class 3D Object Detection. 2021.
C. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Chen, P. Hsiao and L. Fu: VoPiFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2024.
7 Frustum-PointPillars code 52.23 % 60.98 % 48.30 % 0.06 s 4 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
A. Paigwar, D. Sierra-Gonzalez, \. Erkent and C. Laugier: Frustum-PointPillars: A Multi-Stage Approach for 3D Object Detection using RGB Camera and LiDAR. International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV, Workshop on Autonomous Vehicle Vision 2021.
8 LoGoNet code 52.06 % 58.24 % 49.87 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, T. Ma, Y. Hou, B. Shi, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Wu, Q. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Qiao and others: LoGoNet: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Local-to-Global Cross-Modal Fusion. CVPR 2023.
9 TANet code 51.38 % 60.85 % 47.54 % 0.035s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liu, X. Zhao, T. Huang, R. Hu, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: TANet: Robust 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds with Triple Attention. AAAI 2020.
10 focalnet 51.38 % 58.82 % 49.23 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
11 CasA code 51.37 % 57.95 % 49.08 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
12 focalnet 51.34 % 58.94 % 49.21 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
13 SDGUFusion 51.00 % 58.58 % 48.72 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
14 MLF-DET 50.88 % 56.45 % 47.60 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Lin, Y. Shen, S. Zhou, S. Chen and N. Zheng: MLF-DET: Multi-Level Fusion for Cross- Modal 3D Object Detection. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks 2023.
15 MMLab PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 50.57 % 59.86 % 46.74 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, C. Guo, L. Jiang, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
16 DPPFA-Net 50.55 % 57.02 % 47.25 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Wang, X. Kong, H. Nishikawa, Q. Lian and H. Tomiyama: Dynamic Point-Pixel Feature Alignment for Multi-modal 3D Object Detection. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2023.
17 HotSpotNet 50.53 % 57.39 % 46.65 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Chen, L. Sun, Z. Wang, K. Jia and A. Yuille: object as hotspots. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2020.
18 OGMMDet code 50.50 % 57.39 % 46.76 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
19 ANM code 50.50 % 57.39 % 46.76 % ANM ANM
20 VMVS
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 50.34 % 60.34 % 46.45 % 0.25 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ku, A. Pon, S. Walsh and S. Waslander: Improving 3D object detection for pedestrians with virtual multi-view synthesis orientation estimation. IROS 2019.
21 AVOD-FPN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 50.32 % 58.49 % 46.98 % 0.1 s Titan X (Pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
22 3DSSD code 49.94 % 60.54 % 45.73 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu and J. Jia: 3DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detector. CVPR 2020.
23 PointPainting
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 49.93 % 58.70 % 46.29 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Vora, A. Lang, B. Helou and O. Beijbom: PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
24 SemanticVoxels 49.93 % 58.91 % 47.31 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Fei, W. Chen, P. Heidenreich, S. Wirges and C. Stiller: SemanticVoxels: Sequential Fusion for 3D Pedestrian Detection using LiDAR Point Cloud and Semantic Segmentation. MFI 2020.
25 ACDet code 49.82 % 58.35 % 47.17 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Xu, G. Wang, X. Zhang and G. Wan: ACDet: Attentive Cross-view Fusion for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection. 3DV 2022.
26 MMLab-PartA^2
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 49.81 % 59.04 % 45.92 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Network. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2020.
27 USVLab BSAODet code 49.75 % 56.05 % 47.59 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
W. Xiao, Y. Peng, C. Liu, J. Gao, Y. Wu and X. Li: Balanced Sample Assignment and Objective for Single-Model Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2023.
28 ACFNet 49.74 % 58.07 % 47.27 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Tian, X. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Xu, J. Wang, R. Ai, W. Gu and W. Ding: ACF-Net: Asymmetric Cascade Fusion for 3D Detection With LiDAR Point Clouds and Images. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2023.
29 F-PointNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 49.57 % 57.13 % 45.48 % 0.17 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
C. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su and L. Guibas: Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08488 2017.
30 IOUFusion 49.45 % 57.53 % 45.42 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
31 af 49.12 % 55.95 % 46.90 % 1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
32 F-ConvNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 48.96 % 57.04 % 44.33 % 0.47 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Wang and K. Jia: Frustum ConvNet: Sliding Frustums to Aggregate Local Point-Wise Features for Amodal 3D Object Detection. IROS 2019.
33 HVNet 48.86 % 54.84 % 46.33 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
M. Ye, S. Xu and T. Cao: HVNet: Hybrid Voxel Network for LiDAR Based 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
34 CAT-Det 48.78 % 57.13 % 45.56 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Zhang, J. Chen and D. Huang: CAT-Det: Contrastively Augmented Transformer for Multi-modal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
35 STD code 48.72 % 60.02 % 44.55 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: STD: Sparse-to-Dense 3D Object Detector for Point Cloud. ICCV 2019.
36 PSMS-Net
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 48.66 % 55.15 % 45.14 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
37 PointPillars
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 48.64 % 57.60 % 45.78 % 16 ms 1080ti GPU and Intel i7 CPU
A. Lang, S. Vora, H. Caesar, L. Zhou, J. Yang and O. Beijbom: PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Clouds. CVPR 2019.
38 focal 48.56 % 55.56 % 46.42 % 100 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
39 EPNet++ 48.47 % 56.24 % 45.73 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, T. Huang, B. Li, X. Chen, X. Wang and X. Bai: EPNet++: Cascade Bi-Directional Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
40 MGAF-3DSSD code 48.46 % 56.09 % 44.90 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: Anchor-free 3D Single Stage Detector with Mask-Guided Attention for Point Cloud. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
41 FIRM-Net 48.37 % 55.63 % 45.97 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
42 Fast-CLOCs 48.27 % 57.19 % 44.55 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: Fast-CLOCs: Fast Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2022.
43 SCNet3D 48.17 % 54.99 % 45.83 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
44 FromVoxelToPoint code 48.15 % 56.54 % 45.63 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: From Voxel to Point: IoU-guided 3D Object Detection for Point Cloud with Voxel-to- Point Decoder. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
45 SFA-GCL code 47.98 % 56.37 % 44.08 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
46 SFA-GCL_dataaug code 47.95 % 56.33 % 44.07 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
47 EOTL code 47.80 % 56.52 % 43.36 % TBD s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
R. Yang, Z. Yan, T. Yang, Y. Wang and Y. Ruichek: Efficient Online Transfer Learning for Road Participants Detection in Autonomous Driving. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
48 RAFDet 47.80 % 55.20 % 45.34 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
49 HMFI code 47.77 % 55.61 % 45.17 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, B. Shi, Y. Hou, X. Wu, T. Ma, Y. Li and L. He: Homogeneous Multi-modal Feature Fusion and Interaction for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
50 SFA-GCL(baseline) code 47.69 % 55.95 % 43.91 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
51 IIOU code 47.41 % 54.83 % 43.70 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
52 LVFSD 47.41 % 55.85 % 44.77 % 0.06 s
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
53 P2V-RCNN 47.36 % 54.15 % 45.10 % 0.1 s 2 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Li, S. Luo, Z. Zhu, H. Dai, A. Krylov, Y. Ding and L. Shao: P2V-RCNN: Point to Voxel Feature Learning for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. IEEE Access 2021.
54 CZY_PPF_Net 47.22 % 51.95 % 45.46 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
55 Point-GNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 47.07 % 55.36 % 44.61 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Shi and R. Rajkumar: Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloud. CVPR 2020.
56 3ONet 47.05 % 56.76 % 44.62 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Hoang and M. Yoo: 3ONet: 3-D Detector for Occluded Object Under Obstructed Conditions. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
57 OFFNet 47.05 % 53.85 % 44.75 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
58 LGNet-3classes code 46.89 % 52.46 % 44.77 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
59 BPG3D 46.83 % 52.80 % 44.70 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
60 KPTr 46.83 % 53.98 % 44.56 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
61 SCNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 46.73 % 56.87 % 42.74 % 0.04 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, H. Fu, L. Wang, L. Xiao and B. Dai: SCNet: Subdivision Coding Network for Object Detection Based on 3D Point Cloud. IEEE Access 2019.
62 DGEnhCL code 46.53 % 56.39 % 42.65 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
63 PASS-PV-RCNN-Plus 46.36 % 51.47 % 44.10 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Anonymous: Leveraging Anchor-based LiDAR 3D Object Detection via Point Assisted Sample Selection. will submit to computer vision conference/journal 2024.
64 RAFDet code 46.32 % 53.65 % 42.98 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
65 VPA 46.23 % 52.37 % 42.84 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
66 SFA-GCL(80, k=4) code 46.16 % 55.88 % 43.84 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
67 MMLab-PointRCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 46.13 % 54.77 % 42.84 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: Pointrcnn: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2019.
68 ARPNET 45.92 % 55.48 % 42.54 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Ye, C. Zhang and X. Hao: ARPNET: attention region proposal network for 3D object detection. Science China Information Sciences 2019.
69 SFA-GCL(80) code 45.85 % 55.34 % 42.02 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
70 DSA-PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 45.82 % 52.03 % 43.81 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Bhattacharyya, C. Huang and K. Czarnecki: SA-Det3D: Self-Attention Based Context-Aware 3D Object Detection. 2021.
71 SVGA-Net 45.68 % 53.09 % 43.30 % 0.03s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. He, Z. Wang, H. Zeng, Y. Zeng and Y. Liu: SVGA-Net: Sparse Voxel-Graph Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. AAAI 2022.
72 epBRM
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 45.49 % 52.48 % 42.75 % 0.10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Shin: Improving a Quality of 3D Object Detection by Spatial Transformation Mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04853 2019.
73 PG-RCNN code 45.48 % 51.63 % 43.30 % 0.06 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
I. Koo, I. Lee, S. Kim, H. Kim, W. Jeon and C. Kim: PG-RCNN: Semantic Surface Point Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
74 MG 45.46 % 51.71 % 42.09 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
75 PDV code 45.45 % 51.95 % 43.33 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Hu, T. Kuai and S. Waslander: Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
76 MLOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 45.40 % 55.09 % 41.42 % 0.12 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Deng and K. Czarnecki: MLOD: A multi-view 3D object detection based on robust feature fusion method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04163 2019.
77 MLFusion-VS 45.27 % 50.74 % 43.28 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
78 HA-PillarNet 45.26 % 50.50 % 43.21 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
79 centerpoint_pcdet 45.22 % 51.41 % 43.05 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
80 L_SACINet 45.13 % 55.35 % 42.62 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
81 IA-SSD (single) code 45.07 % 52.73 % 42.75 % 0.013 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
82 DiffCandiDet 45.02 % 52.45 % 41.24 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
83 DFAF3D 45.01 % 52.86 % 42.73 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Tang, X. Bai, J. Guo, B. Pan and W. Jiang: DFAF3D: A dual-feature-aware anchor-free single-stage 3D detector for point clouds. Image and Vision Computing 2023.
84 voxelnext_pcdet 44.91 % 52.43 % 42.56 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
85 SRDL 44.84 % 52.42 % 42.56 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
86 M3DeTR code 44.78 % 50.63 % 42.57 % n/a s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
T. Guan, J. Wang, S. Lan, R. Chandra, Z. Wu, L. Davis and D. Manocha: M3DeTR: Multi-representation, Multi- scale, Mutual-relation 3D Object Detection with Transformers. 2021.
87 Anonymous code 44.66 % 53.73 % 42.58 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
88 PI-SECOND code 44.64 % 54.33 % 40.68 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
89 PV-RCNN-Plus 44.61 % 51.20 % 42.55 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
90 MFB3D 44.54 % 49.77 % 42.09 % 0.14 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
91 TF-PartA2 44.47 % 53.22 % 41.88 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
92 SIF 44.28 % 52.05 % 42.03 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
P. An: SIF. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
93 BAPartA2S-4h 44.18 % 53.05 % 41.54 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
94 bs 44.18 % 50.59 % 41.92 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
95 R50_SACINet 44.17 % 52.52 % 41.84 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
96 CG-SSD 44.17 % 50.84 % 42.02 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
97 SFA-GCL code 44.17 % 53.53 % 41.97 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
98 DVFENet 44.12 % 50.98 % 41.62 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. He, G. Xia, Y. Luo, L. Su, Z. Zhang, W. Li and P. Wang: DVFENet: Dual-branch Voxel Feature Extraction Network for 3D Object Detection. Neurocomputing 2021.
99 Test_dif code 43.97 % 51.07 % 41.05 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
100 Faraway-Frustum
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 43.85 % 52.15 % 41.68 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhang, D. Yang, E. Yurtsever, K. Redmill and U. Ozguner: Faraway-frustum: Dealing with lidar sparsity for 3D object detection using fusion. 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2021.
101 RAFDet 43.81 % 51.37 % 41.62 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
102 GSG-FPS code 43.77 % 50.21 % 41.60 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
103 HAF-PVP_test 43.70 % 50.24 % 40.12 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
104 SC-SSD 43.64 % 50.05 % 41.56 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
105 PR-SSD 43.58 % 50.38 % 41.36 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
106 GF-pointnet 43.47 % 50.12 % 41.30 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
107 GeVo 43.46 % 47.87 % 41.53 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
108 S-AT GCN 43.43 % 50.63 % 41.58 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, C. Wang, X. Zhang, T. Lan and J. Li: S-AT GCN: Spatial-Attention Graph Convolution Network based Feature Enhancement for 3D Object Detection. CoRR 2021.
109 AAMVFNet code 43.29 % 49.38 % 40.33 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
110 SecAtten 42.89 % 51.42 % 40.28 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
111 BirdNet+
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 42.87 % 48.90 % 40.59 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, J. Iglesias and F. García: BirdNet+: Two-Stage 3D Object Detection in LiDAR through a Sparsity-Invariant Bird’s Eye View. IEEE Access 2021.
112 L-AUG 42.84 % 50.32 % 40.29 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Cortinhal, I. Gouigah and E. Aksoy: Semantics-aware LiDAR-Only Pseudo Point Cloud Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
113 AEPF 42.84 % 50.61 % 40.74 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
114 XT-PartA2 42.68 % 50.62 % 40.25 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
115 IA-SSD (multi) code 42.61 % 51.76 % 40.51 % 0.014 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
116 AMVFNet code 42.61 % 50.04 % 39.35 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
117 prcnn_v18_80_100 42.48 % 50.92 % 38.81 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
118 XView 42.42 % 47.24 % 39.96 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Xie, G. Xu, D. Cai and X. He: X-view: Non-egocentric Multi-View 3D Object Detector. 2021.
119 PCNet3D 42.19 % 50.02 % 39.69 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
120 GraphAlign(ICCV2023) code 41.95 % 46.61 % 40.05 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Song, H. Wei, L. Bai, L. Yang and C. Jia: GraphAlign: Enhancing accurate feature alignment by graph matching for multi-modal 3D object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2023.
121 SeSame-voxel code 41.59 % 50.12 % 37.79 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
122 HINTED 41.55 % 53.09 % 39.18 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
123 PUDet 41.48 % 50.24 % 39.22 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
124 mm3d_PartA2 41.24 % 48.45 % 38.92 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
125 SeSame-point code 41.22 % 48.25 % 39.18 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
126 PFF3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 40.94 % 48.74 % 38.54 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Wen and K. Jo: Fast and Accurate 3D Object Detection for Lidar-Camera-Based Autonomous Vehicles Using One Shared Voxel-Based Backbone. IEEE Access 2021.
127 VoxelFSD-S 40.39 % 47.66 % 38.12 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
128 VSAC 40.37 % 49.91 % 36.64 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
129 IIOU_LDR code 40.24 % 48.51 % 37.03 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
130 MM_SECOND code 40.22 % 49.46 % 37.46 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
131 ROT_S3D 40.08 % 46.62 % 38.33 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
132 DSGN++
This method uses stereo information.
 code 38.92 % 50.26 % 35.12 % 0.2 s GeForce RTX 2080Ti
Y. Chen, S. Huang, S. Liu, B. Yu and J. Jia: DSGN++: Exploiting Visual-Spatial Relation for Stereo-Based 3D Detectors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
133 AB3DMOT
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 38.79 % 47.51 % 35.85 % 0.0047s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (python)
X. Weng and K. Kitani: A Baseline for 3D Multi-Object Tracking. arXiv:1907.03961 2019.
134 BirdNet+ (legacy)
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 38.28 % 45.53 % 35.37 % 0.1 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, C. Guindel, J. Beltrán and F. García: BirdNet+: End-to-End 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Bird’s Eye View. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
135 CSW3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 37.96 % 49.27 % 33.83 % 0.03 s 4 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Hu, T. Wu, H. Fu, Z. Wang and K. Ding: Cascaded Sliding Window Based Real-Time 3D Region Proposal for Pedestrian Detection. ROBIO 2019.
136 StereoDistill 37.75 % 50.79 % 34.28 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, X. Ye, X. Tan, D. Errui, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: StereoDistill: Pick the Cream from LiDAR for Distilling Stereo-based 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2023.
137 SeSame-pillar code 37.31 % 44.21 % 35.17 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
138 P2P code 36.71 % 44.67 % 34.86 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
139 DMF
This method uses stereo information.
 34.92 % 42.08 % 32.69 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. J. Chen and W. Xu: Disparity-Based Multiscale Fusion Network for Transportation Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2022.
140 SparsePool code 34.15 % 43.33 % 31.78 % 0.13 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, W. Zhan and M. Tomizuka: Fusing bird view lidar point cloud and front view camera image for deep object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06703 2017.
141 MMLAB LIGA-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 34.13 % 44.71 % 30.42 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Guo, S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: LIGA-Stereo: Learning LiDAR Geometry Aware Representations for Stereo-based 3D Detector. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2021.
142 SeSame-voxel w/score code 33.76 % 39.42 % 31.31 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
143 AVOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 33.57 % 42.58 % 30.14 % 0.08 s Titan X (pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
144 SparsePool code 33.22 % 41.55 % 29.66 % 0.13 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, W. Zhan and M. Tomizuka: Fusing bird view lidar point cloud and front view camera image for deep object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06703 2017.
145 SeSame-pillar w/scor code 32.78 % 39.11 % 30.87 % N/A s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
146 ODGS 31.23 % 37.54 % 28.97 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
147 SFEBEV 31.04 % 38.14 % 29.09 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
148 CG-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 29.56 % 39.24 % 25.87 % 0.57 s GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
C. Li, J. Ku and S. Waslander: Confidence Guided Stereo 3D Object Detection with Split Depth Estimation. IROS 2020.
149 PointRGBNet 29.32 % 38.07 % 26.94 % 0.08 s 4 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Xie Desheng: Real-time Detection of 3D Objects Based on Multi-Sensor Information Fusion. Automotive Engineering 2022.
150 Disp R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 29.12 % 42.72 % 25.09 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
151 Disp R-CNN (velo)
This method uses stereo information.
 code 28.34 % 40.21 % 24.46 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
152 SeSame-point w/score code 25.79 % 33.98 % 22.50 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
153 BirdNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 23.06 % 28.20 % 21.65 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (Caffe)
J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, F. Moreno, D. Cruzado, F. García and A. Escalera: BirdNet: A 3D Object Detection Framework from LiDAR Information. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
154 OC Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 20.80 % 29.79 % 18.62 % 0.35 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Pon, J. Ku, C. Li and S. Waslander: Object-Centric Stereo Matching for 3D Object Detection. ICRA 2020.
155 YOLOStereo3D
This method uses stereo information.
 code 20.76 % 31.01 % 18.41 % 0.1 s GPU 1080Ti
Y. Liu, L. Wang and M. Liu: YOLOStereo3D: A Step Back to 2D for Efficient Stereo 3D Detection. 2021 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2021.
156 DSGN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 20.75 % 26.61 % 18.86 % 0.67 s NVIDIA Tesla V100
Y. Chen, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: DSGN: Deep Stereo Geometry Network for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
157 Complexer-YOLO
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 18.26 % 21.42 % 17.06 % 0.06 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (C/C++)
M. Simon, K. Amende, A. Kraus, J. Honer, T. Samann, H. Kaulbersch, S. Milz and H. Michael Gross: Complexer-YOLO: Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Tracking on Semantic Point Clouds. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops 2019.
158 BKDStereo3D code 17.44 % 25.47 % 14.44 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
159 BKDStereo3D w/o KD code 16.87 % 23.82 % 14.85 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
160 TopNet-Retina
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 14.57 % 18.04 % 12.48 % 52ms GeForce 1080Ti (tensorflow-gpu, v1.12)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
161 RT3D-GMP
This method uses stereo information.
 14.22 % 19.92 % 12.83 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Königshof and C. Stiller: Learning-Based Shape Estimation with Grid Map Patches for Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
162 MonoLTKD_V3 13.62 % 19.79 % 11.92 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
163 TopNet-HighRes
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 13.50 % 19.43 % 11.93 % 101ms NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
164 MonoTAKD V2 13.47 % 19.67 % 11.75 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
165 ESGN
This method uses stereo information.
 13.03 % 17.94 % 11.54 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Gao, Y. Pang, J. Nie, Z. Shao, J. Cao, Y. Guo and X. Li: ESGN: Efficient Stereo Geometry Network for Fast 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2022.
166 SST [st]
This method uses stereo information.
 12.66 % 19.18 % 11.07 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
167 DD3D code 12.51 % 18.58 % 10.65 % n/a s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Park, R. Ambrus, V. Guizilini, J. Li and A. Gaidon: Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) .
168 MonoLSS 12.34 % 18.40 % 10.54 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, J. Jia and Y. Shi: MonoLSS: Learnable Sample Selection For Monocular 3D Detection. International Conference on 3D Vision 2024.
169 PS-fld code 12.23 % 19.03 % 10.53 % 0.25 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Chen, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Pseudo-Stereo for Monocular 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
170 MonoTAKD 12.15 % 18.23 % 10.50 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
171 CIE 11.94 % 17.90 % 10.34 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Anonymities: Consistency of Implicit and Explicit Features Matters for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07933 2022.
172 MonoLTKD 11.85 % 17.74 % 10.26 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
173 error 11.11 % 16.66 % 9.46 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
174 OPA-3D code 11.01 % 17.14 % 9.94 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Su, Y. Di, G. Zhai, F. Manhardt, J. Rambach, B. Busam, D. Stricker and F. Tombari: OPA-3D: Occlusion-Aware Pixel-Wise Aggregation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2023.
175 MonoUNI code 10.90 % 16.54 % 9.17 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Jia, Z. Li and Y. Shi: MonoUNI: A Unified Vehicle and Infrastructure-side Monocular 3D Object Detection Network with Sufficient Depth Clues. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
176 MonoDTR 10.59 % 16.66 % 9.00 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Huang, T. Wu, H. Su and W. Hsu: MonoDTR: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Transformer. CVPR 2022.
177 MonoFRD 10.38 % 15.68 % 8.79 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
178 GUPNet code 10.37 % 15.62 % 8.79 % NA s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Lu, X. Ma, L. Yang, T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Q. Chu, J. Yan and W. Ouyang: Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13774 2021.
179 CMKD code 10.28 % 16.03 % 8.85 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Hong, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Cross-Modality Knowledge Distillation Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
180 MonoSIM 10.08 % 15.80 % 8.64 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
181 DEVIANT code 9.77 % 14.49 % 8.28 % 0.04 s 1 GPU (Python)
A. Kumar, G. Brazil, E. Corona, A. Parchami and X. Liu: DEVIANT: Depth EquiVarIAnt NeTwork for Monocular 3D Object Detection. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2022.
182 PS-SVDM 9.75 % 15.03 % 8.37 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
183 MonoNeRD code 9.66 % 15.27 % 8.28 % na s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Xu, L. Peng, H. Cheng, H. Li, W. Qian, K. Li, W. Wang and D. Cai: MonoNeRD: NeRF-like Representations for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2023.
184 CaDDN code 9.41 % 14.72 % 8.17 % 0.63 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Reading, A. Harakeh, J. Chae and S. Waslander: Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
185 SGM3D code 9.39 % 15.39 % 8.61 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Zhou, L. Du, X. Ye, Z. Zou, X. Tan, L. Zhang, X. Xue and J. Feng: SGM3D: Stereo Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. RA-L 2022.
186 MonoRCNN++ code 9.04 % 13.45 % 7.74 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Shi, Z. Chen and T. Kim: Multivariate Probabilistic Monocular 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
187 HomoLoss(monoflex) code 8.81 % 13.26 % 7.41 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Gu, B. Wu, L. Fan, J. Huang, S. Cao, Z. Xiang and X. Hua: Homography Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
188 mdab 8.79 % 13.79 % 7.99 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
189 mdab 8.78 % 13.62 % 7.88 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
190 MonoSIM_v2 8.62 % 13.13 % 7.27 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
191 MonoDDE 8.41 % 12.38 % 7.16 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, Z. Qu, Y. Zhou, J. Liu, H. Wang and L. Jiang: Diversity Matters: Fully Exploiting Depth Clues for Reliable Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
192 Mix-Teaching code 8.40 % 12.34 % 7.06 % 30 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Wang, M. Zhu, C. Zhang and J. Li: Mix-Teaching: A Simple, Unified and Effective Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ArXiv 2022.
193 MDSNet 8.18 % 12.05 % 7.03 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Xie, Y. Song, J. Wu, Z. Li, C. Song and Z. Xu: MDS-Net: Multi-Scale Depth Stratification 3D Object Detection from Monocular Images. Sensors 2022.
194 PS-SVDM 8.11 % 12.70 % 6.84 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
195 LPCG-Monoflex code 7.92 % 12.11 % 6.61 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Peng, F. Liu, Z. Yu, S. Yan, D. Deng, Z. Yang, H. Liu and D. Cai: Lidar Point Cloud Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
196 RefinedMPL 7.92 % 13.09 % 7.25 % 0.15 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Vianney, S. Aich and B. Liu: RefinedMPL: Refined Monocular PseudoLiDAR for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.09712 2019.
197 Cube R-CNN code 7.65 % 11.67 % 6.60 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil, A. Kumar, J. Straub, N. Ravi, J. Johnson and G. Gkioxari: Omni3D: A Large Benchmark and Model for 3D Object Detection in the Wild. CVPR 2023.
198 MonoRUn code 7.59 % 11.70 % 6.34 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Chen, Y. Huang, W. Tian, Z. Gao and L. Xiong: MonoRUn: Monocular 3D Object Detection by Reconstruction and Uncertainty Propagation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
199 MonoFlex 7.36 % 10.36 % 6.29 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhang, J. Lu and J. Zhou: Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
200 MonoTRKDv2 7.22 % 11.05 % 6.11 % 40 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
201 DA3D+KM3D+v2-99 7.06 % 10.32 % 6.10 % 0.120s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
202 MonoPair 7.04 % 10.99 % 6.29 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Chen, L. Tai, K. Sun and M. Li: MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationships. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020.
203 monodle code 6.96 % 10.73 % 6.20 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Ma, Y. Zhang, D. Xu, D. Zhou, S. Yi, H. Li and W. Ouyang: Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021 .
204 MonOAPC 6.82 % 9.62 % 5.78 % 0035 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, P. Han, X. Chai and Y. Qiu: Occlusion-Aware Plane-Constraints for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2023.
205 TopNet-DecayRate
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 6.59 % 8.78 % 6.25 % 92 ms NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
206 MonoAIU 6.43 % 9.55 % 5.39 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
207 mdab 6.36 % 10.26 % 5.62 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
208 Shift R-CNN (mono) code 5.66 % 8.58 % 4.49 % 0.25 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Naiden, V. Paunescu, G. Kim, B. Jeon and M. Leordeanu: Shift R-CNN: Deep Monocular 3D Object Detection With Closed-form Geometric Constraints. ICIP 2019.
209 FMF-occlusion-net 5.62 % 8.69 % 5.25 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Wang, F. Sun and W. Huang: Fine-grained Multi-level Fusion for Anti- occlusion Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2022.
210 Aug3D-RPN 5.22 % 7.14 % 4.21 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. He, J. Huang, X. Hua and L. Zhang: Aug3D-RPN: Improving Monocular 3D Object Detection by Synthetic Images with Virtual Depth. 2021.
211 TopNet-UncEst
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 4.60 % 6.88 % 3.79 % 0.09 s NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, M. Braun, M. Lauer and C. Stiller: Capturing Object Detection Uncertainty in Multi-Layer Grid Maps. 2019.
212 MonoPSR code 4.56 % 7.24 % 4.11 % 0.2 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ku*, A. Pon* and S. Waslander: Monocular 3D Object Detection Leveraging Accurate Proposals and Shape Reconstruction. CVPR 2019.
213 DFR-Net 4.52 % 6.66 % 3.71 % 0.18 s 1080 Ti (Pytorch)
Z. Zou, X. Ye, L. Du, X. Cheng, X. Tan, L. Zhang, J. Feng, X. Xue and E. Ding: The devil is in the task: Exploiting reciprocal appearance-localization features for monocular 3d object detection . ICCV 2021.
214 MonoGhost_Ped_Cycl 4.49 % 7.14 % 4.39 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
215 QD-3DT
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 4.23 % 6.62 % 3.39 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Hu, Y. Yang, T. Fischer, F. Yu, T. Darrell and M. Sun: Monocular Quasi-Dense 3D Object Tracking. ArXiv:2103.07351 2021.
216 DA3D+KM3D code 4.05 % 5.94 % 3.55 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
217 M3D-RPN code 4.05 % 5.65 % 3.29 % 0.16 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil and X. Liu: M3D-RPN: Monocular 3D Region Proposal Network for Object Detection . ICCV 2019 .
218 DDMP-3D 4.02 % 5.53 % 3.36 % 0.18 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, L. Du, X. Ye, Y. Fu, G. Guo, X. Xue, J. Feng and L. Zhang: Depth-conditioned Dynamic Message Propagation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
219 CMAN 3.96 % 5.24 % 3.18 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Yuanzhouhan Cao: CMAN: Leaning Global Structure Correlation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2022.
220 D4LCN code 3.86 % 5.06 % 3.59 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Ding, Y. Huo, H. Yi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, Z. Lu and P. Luo: Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
221 RT3DStereo
This method uses stereo information.
 3.65 % 4.72 % 3.00 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Königshof, N. Salscheider and C. Stiller: Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving Using Stereo Vision and Semantic Information. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems 2019.
222 DA3D 3.27 % 4.93 % 2.74 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
223 MonoEF 3.05 % 4.61 % 2.85 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhou, Y. He, H. Zhu, C. Wang, H. Li and Q. Jiang: Monocular 3D Object Detection: An Extrinsic Parameter Free Approach. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
224 MonoLiG code 2.72 % 3.74 % 2.55 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Hekimoglu, M. Schmidt and A. Ramiro: Monocular 3D Object Detection with LiDAR Guided Semi Supervised Active Learning. 2023.
225 mdab 2.43 % 3.68 % 2.26 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
226 SS3D 2.09 % 2.48 % 1.61 % 48 ms Tesla V100 (Python)
E. Jörgensen, C. Zach and F. Kahl: Monocular 3D Object Detection and Box Fitting Trained End-to-End Using Intersection-over-Union Loss. CoRR 2019.
227 SparVox3D 2.05 % 2.90 % 1.69 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
E. Balatkan and F. Kıraç: Improving Regression Performance on Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Bin-Mixing and Sparse Voxel Data. 2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) 2021.
228 PGD-FCOS3D code 1.88 % 2.82 % 1.54 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Wang, X. Zhu, J. Pang and D. Lin: Probabilistic and Geometric Depth: Detecting Objects in Perspective. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2021.
229 MonoAuxNorm 1.24 % 1.58 % 0.96 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
230 Plane-Constraints code 1.16 % 1.87 % 1.13 % 0.05 s 4 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, X. Chai, Y. Qiu and P. Han: Vertex points are not enough: Monocular 3D object detection via intra-and inter-plane constraints. Neural Networks 2023.
231 f3sd code 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 1.67 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
232 mBoW
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Behley, V. Steinhage and A. Cremers: Laser-based Segment Classification Using a Mixture of Bag-of-Words. Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2013.
Table as LaTeX | Only published Methods

Cyclist


Method Setting Code Moderate Easy Hard Runtime Environment
1 UPIDet code 78.19 % 89.65 % 71.13 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Hou, Y. Yuan and G. Xing: Unleash the Potential of Image Branch for Cross-modal 3D Object Detection. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
2 CasA++ code 76.99 % 88.93 % 70.10 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
3 TED code 76.95 % 89.54 % 70.31 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, C. Wen, W. Li, R. Yang and C. Wang: Transformation-Equivariant 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving. AAAI 2023.
4 CasA code 75.74 % 88.99 % 68.47 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Wu, J. Deng, C. Wen, X. Li and C. Wang: CasA: A Cascade Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from LiDAR point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2022.
5 LoGoNet code 74.92 % 85.85 % 67.62 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, T. Ma, Y. Hou, B. Shi, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Wu, Q. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Qiao and others: LoGoNet: Towards Accurate 3D Object Detection with Local-to-Global Cross-Modal Fusion. CVPR 2023.
6 MLF-DET 74.88 % 86.20 % 66.75 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Lin, Y. Shen, S. Zhou, S. Chen and N. Zheng: MLF-DET: Multi-Level Fusion for Cross- Modal 3D Object Detection. International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks 2023.
7 USVLab BSAODet code 74.38 % 85.01 % 67.38 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
W. Xiao, Y. Peng, C. Liu, J. Gao, Y. Wu and X. Li: Balanced Sample Assignment and Objective for Single-Model Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2023.
8 PSMS-Net
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 74.30 % 85.06 % 66.34 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
9 HMFI code 74.06 % 85.69 % 67.11 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
X. Li, B. Shi, Y. Hou, X. Wu, T. Ma, Y. Li and L. He: Homogeneous Multi-modal Feature Fusion and Interaction for 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
10 VPA 73.91 % 84.94 % 66.92 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
11 CZY_PPF_Net 73.64 % 85.39 % 66.01 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
12 EQ-PVRCNN code 73.30 % 86.25 % 65.49 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, L. Jiang, Y. Sun, B. Schiele and J. Jia: A Unified Query-based Paradigm for Point Cloud Understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2022.
13 OGMMDet code 72.92 % 86.07 % 65.95 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
14 ANM code 72.92 % 86.07 % 65.95 % ANM ANM
15 OFFNet 72.74 % 83.33 % 67.53 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
16 DSA-PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 72.61 % 83.93 % 65.82 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Bhattacharyya, C. Huang and K. Czarnecki: SA-Det3D: Self-Attention Based Context-Aware 3D Object Detection. 2021.
17 CAT-Det 72.51 % 85.35 % 65.55 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Zhang, J. Chen and D. Huang: CAT-Det: Contrastively Augmented Transformer for Multi-modal 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
18 HA-PillarNet 72.50 % 86.25 % 65.38 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
19 KPTr 72.24 % 83.83 % 63.94 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
20 GF-pointnet 71.90 % 84.28 % 63.75 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
21 BtcDet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 71.76 % 84.48 % 64.70 % 0.09 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhong and U. Neumann: Behind the Curtain: Learning Occluded Shapes for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2022.
22 ACFNet 71.68 % 85.76 % 65.33 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Tian, X. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Xu, J. Wang, R. Ai, W. Gu and W. Ding: ACF-Net: Asymmetric Cascade Fusion for 3D Detection With LiDAR Point Clouds and Images. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2023.
23 RagNet3D code 71.64 % 85.10 % 65.02 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
24 Anonymous code 71.61 % 86.04 % 63.31 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
25 focalnet 71.57 % 82.10 % 65.37 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
26 PointPainting
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 71.54 % 83.91 % 62.97 % 0.4 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Vora, A. Lang, B. Helou and O. Beijbom: PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
27 PASS-PV-RCNN-Plus 71.51 % 83.03 % 63.85 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Anonymous: Leveraging Anchor-based LiDAR 3D Object Detection via Point Assisted Sample Selection. will submit to computer vision conference/journal 2024.
28 PV-RCNN-Plus 71.51 % 83.83 % 64.77 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
29 RangeIoUDet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 71.49 % 85.99 % 63.62 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liang, Z. Zhang, M. Zhang, X. Zhao and S. Pu: RangeIoUDet: Range Image Based Real-Time 3D Object Detector Optimized by Intersection Over Union. CVPR 2021.
30 ACDet code 71.48 % 87.76 % 64.69 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Xu, G. Wang, X. Zhang and G. Wan: ACDet: Attentive Cross-view Fusion for LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection. 3DV 2022.
31 IA-SSD (single) code 71.44 % 85.91 % 63.41 % 0.013 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
32 PDV code 71.31 % 85.54 % 64.40 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Hu, T. Kuai and S. Waslander: Point Density-Aware Voxels for LiDAR 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
33 3ONet 71.29 % 85.17 % 62.99 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Hoang and M. Yoo: 3ONet: 3-D Detector for Occluded Object Under Obstructed Conditions. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
34 DFAF3D 71.27 % 85.75 % 64.25 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Tang, X. Bai, J. Guo, B. Pan and W. Jiang: DFAF3D: A dual-feature-aware anchor-free single-stage 3D detector for point clouds. Image and Vision Computing 2023.
35 BPG3D 71.24 % 85.28 % 63.42 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
36 focalnet 71.24 % 81.78 % 65.37 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
37 HVNet 71.17 % 83.97 % 63.65 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
M. Ye, S. Xu and T. Cao: HVNet: Hybrid Voxel Network for LiDAR Based 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
38 DiffCandiDet 71.11 % 85.33 % 64.52 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
39 RAFDet 70.99 % 84.92 % 62.93 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
40 M3DeTR code 70.89 % 85.03 % 63.14 % n/a s GPU @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
T. Guan, J. Wang, S. Lan, R. Chandra, Z. Wu, L. Davis and D. Manocha: M3DeTR: Multi-representation, Multi- scale, Mutual-relation 3D Object Detection with Transformers. 2021.
41 PR-SSD 70.88 % 83.44 % 63.43 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
42 HAF-PVP_test 70.66 % 83.99 % 62.42 % 0.09 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
43 PG-RCNN code 70.65 % 84.94 % 64.03 % 0.06 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
I. Koo, I. Lee, S. Kim, H. Kim, W. Jeon and C. Kim: PG-RCNN: Semantic Surface Point Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
44 AAMVFNet code 70.52 % 84.47 % 63.85 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
45 LGNet-3classes code 70.44 % 81.32 % 62.95 % 0.11 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
46 AMVFNet code 70.44 % 83.98 % 63.87 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
47 SPG_mini
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 70.09 % 82.66 % 63.61 % 0.09 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Q. Xu, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, C. Qi and D. Anguelov: SPG: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 3D Object Detection via Semantic Point Generation. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (ICCV) 2021.
48 SDGUFusion 70.05 % 81.15 % 63.98 % 0.5 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
49 RAFDet code 69.81 % 82.41 % 62.17 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
50 RAFDet 69.79 % 81.93 % 62.63 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
51 GeVo 69.56 % 83.03 % 62.74 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
52 MFB3D 69.52 % 83.15 % 63.38 % 0.14 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
53 GraphAlign(ICCV2023) code 69.43 % 80.71 % 63.57 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Song, H. Wei, L. Bai, L. Yang and C. Jia: GraphAlign: Enhancing accurate feature alignment by graph matching for multi-modal 3D object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2023.
54 FIRM-Net 69.09 % 82.99 % 62.48 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
55 MMLab PV-RCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 68.89 % 82.49 % 62.41 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, C. Guo, L. Jiang, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
56 F-ConvNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 68.88 % 84.16 % 60.05 % 0.47 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Wang and K. Jia: Frustum ConvNet: Sliding Frustums to Aggregate Local Point-Wise Features for Amodal 3D Object Detection. IROS 2019.
57 IIOU code 68.82 % 83.89 % 60.14 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
58 SCNet3D 68.77 % 84.49 % 62.12 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
59 bs 68.73 % 82.32 % 62.18 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
60 MMLab-PartA^2
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 68.73 % 83.43 % 61.85 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Network. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2020.
61 HotSpotNet 68.51 % 83.29 % 61.84 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. Chen, L. Sun, Z. Wang, K. Jia and A. Yuille: object as hotspots. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2020.
62 MLFusion-VS 68.43 % 80.99 % 62.46 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
63 CG-SSD 68.24 % 79.80 % 61.05 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
64 P2V-RCNN 68.06 % 81.09 % 60.73 % 0.1 s 2 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Li, S. Luo, Z. Zhu, H. Dai, A. Krylov, Y. Ding and L. Shao: P2V-RCNN: Point to Voxel Feature Learning for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. IEEE Access 2021.
65 SFA-GCL(80) code 68.06 % 84.65 % 61.18 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
66 H^23D R-CNN code 67.90 % 82.76 % 60.49 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Deng, W. Zhou, Y. Zhang and H. Li: From Multi-View to Hollow-3D: Hallucinated Hollow-3D R-CNN for 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2021.
67 SFA-GCL code 67.72 % 84.16 % 60.89 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
68 focal 67.67 % 80.82 % 61.88 % 100 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
69 VPFNet code 67.66 % 80.83 % 61.36 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. Wang, H. Chen and L. Fu: VPFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-class 3D Object Detection. 2021.
C. Wang, H. Chen, Y. Chen, P. Hsiao and L. Fu: VoPiFNet: Voxel-Pixel Fusion Network for Multi-Class 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2024.
70 3DSSD code 67.62 % 85.04 % 61.14 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu and J. Jia: 3DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detector. CVPR 2020.
71 Fast-CLOCs 67.55 % 83.34 % 59.61 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
S. Pang, D. Morris and H. Radha: Fast-CLOCs: Fast Camera-LiDAR Object Candidates Fusion for 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2022.
72 SFA-GCL(80, k=4) code 67.46 % 84.31 % 58.87 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
73 XT-PartA2 67.40 % 81.41 % 61.92 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
74 DVFENet 67.40 % 82.29 % 60.71 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. He, G. Xia, Y. Luo, L. Su, Z. Zhang, W. Li and P. Wang: DVFENet: Dual-branch Voxel Feature Extraction Network for 3D Object Detection. Neurocomputing 2021.
75 FromVoxelToPoint code 67.36 % 82.68 % 59.15 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: From Voxel to Point: IoU-guided 3D Object Detection for Point Cloud with Voxel-to- Point Decoder. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
76 Point-GNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 67.28 % 81.17 % 59.67 % 0.6 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
W. Shi and R. Rajkumar: Point-GNN: Graph Neural Network for 3D Object Detection in a Point Cloud. CVPR 2020.
77 HINTED 67.27 % 81.53 % 60.88 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
78 MMLab-PointRCNN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 67.24 % 82.56 % 60.28 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: Pointrcnn: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2019.
79 STD code 67.23 % 81.36 % 59.35 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: STD: Sparse-to-Dense 3D Object Detector for Point Cloud. ICCV 2019.
80 mm3d_PartA2 67.12 % 82.10 % 60.42 % 0.1 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
81 BAPartA2S-4h 67.05 % 82.22 % 61.08 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
82 SVGA-Net 66.82 % 81.25 % 59.37 % 0.03s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Q. He, Z. Wang, H. Zeng, Y. Zeng and Y. Liu: SVGA-Net: Sparse Voxel-Graph Attention Network for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds. AAAI 2022.
83 L_SACINet 66.72 % 80.63 % 60.50 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
84 S-AT GCN 66.71 % 78.53 % 60.19 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.0 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, C. Wang, X. Zhang, T. Lan and J. Li: S-AT GCN: Spatial-Attention Graph Convolution Network based Feature Enhancement for 3D Object Detection. CoRR 2021.
85 TF-PartA2 66.67 % 82.42 % 60.64 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
86 ARPNET 66.39 % 82.32 % 58.80 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Ye, C. Zhang and X. Hao: ARPNET: attention region proposal network for 3D object detection. Science China Information Sciences 2019.
87 SecAtten 66.30 % 79.23 % 60.98 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
88 IA-SSD (multi) code 66.29 % 81.30 % 59.58 % 0.014 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Zhang, Q. Hu, G. Xu, Y. Ma, J. Wan and Y. Guo: Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Clouds. CVPR 2022.
89 MGAF-3DSSD code 66.00 % 83.03 % 57.57 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Li, H. Dai, L. Shao and Y. Ding: Anchor-free 3D Single Stage Detector with Mask-Guided Attention for Point Cloud. MM '21: The 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) 2021.
90 IOUFusion 65.88 % 82.98 % 59.11 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
91 AB3DMOT
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 65.85 % 80.00 % 58.69 % 0.0047s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Weng and K. Kitani: A Baseline for 3D Multi-Object Tracking. arXiv:1907.03961 2019.
92 EOTL code 65.76 % 81.44 % 56.47 % TBD s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
R. Yang, Z. Yan, T. Yang, Y. Wang and Y. Ruichek: Efficient Online Transfer Learning for Road Participants Detection in Autonomous Driving. IEEE Sensors Journal 2023.
93 PI-SECOND code 65.62 % 81.99 % 59.19 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
94 MG 65.43 % 81.05 % 59.11 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
95 SC-SSD 65.36 % 79.14 % 58.50 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
96 SFA-GCL code 65.22 % 82.10 % 56.54 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
97 af 65.12 % 78.85 % 59.17 % 1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
98 DGEnhCL code 65.07 % 81.38 % 58.13 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
99 centerpoint_pcdet 64.99 % 79.83 % 58.43 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
100 Test_dif code 64.80 % 80.24 % 58.49 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
101 voxelnext_pcdet 64.66 % 81.10 % 57.53 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
102 GSG-FPS code 64.65 % 78.65 % 58.47 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
103 Res3DNet 64.64 % 79.47 % 57.99 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
104 Faraway-Frustum
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 64.54 % 79.65 % 57.84 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Zhang, D. Yang, E. Yurtsever, K. Redmill and U. Ozguner: Faraway-frustum: Dealing with lidar sparsity for 3D object detection using fusion. 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) 2021.
105 SRDL 64.52 % 79.64 % 57.90 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
106 VoxelFSD-S 64.26 % 80.07 % 57.17 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
107 SIF 64.13 % 79.32 % 57.38 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
P. An: SIF. Submitted to CVIU 2021.
108 prcnn_v18_80_100 63.87 % 80.66 % 57.25 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
109 TANet code 63.77 % 79.16 % 56.21 % 0.035s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Z. Liu, X. Zhao, T. Huang, R. Hu, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: TANet: Robust 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds with Triple Attention. AAAI 2020.
110 R50_SACINet 63.76 % 76.73 % 57.71 % 0.06 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
111 SFA-GCL_dataaug code 63.35 % 81.93 % 56.47 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
112 ROT_S3D 63.26 % 79.60 % 56.95 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
113 SFA-GCL(baseline) code 63.24 % 81.50 % 56.42 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
114 XView 63.06 % 81.32 % 56.65 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Xie, G. Xu, D. Cai and X. He: X-view: Non-egocentric Multi-View 3D Object Detector. 2021.
115 EPNet++ 62.94 % 78.57 % 56.62 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, T. Huang, B. Li, X. Chen, X. Wang and X. Bai: EPNet++: Cascade Bi-Directional Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
116 PointPillars
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 62.73 % 79.90 % 55.58 % 16 ms 1080ti GPU and Intel i7 CPU
A. Lang, S. Vora, H. Caesar, L. Zhou, J. Yang and O. Beijbom: PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Clouds. CVPR 2019.
117 MM_SECOND code 62.61 % 77.98 % 55.67 % 0.05 s GPU @ >3.5 Ghz (Python)
118 L-AUG 62.56 % 75.41 % 56.86 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Cortinhal, I. Gouigah and E. Aksoy: Semantics-aware LiDAR-Only Pseudo Point Cloud Generation for 3D Object Detection. 2023.
119 PCNet3D 62.48 % 78.52 % 55.54 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
120 IIOU_LDR code 61.70 % 77.26 % 55.43 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
121 SeSame-point code 61.70 % 75.73 % 55.27 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
122 LVFSD 61.68 % 79.03 % 55.02 % 0.06 s
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
123 F-PointNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 61.37 % 77.26 % 53.78 % 0.17 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
C. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su and L. Guibas: Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08488 2017.
124 P2P code 61.03 % 75.03 % 55.05 % 0.1 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
125 VSAC 60.23 % 78.55 % 53.91 % 0.07 s 1 core @ 1.0 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
126 SeSame-pillar code 60.21 % 72.22 % 53.67 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
127 epBRM
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 59.79 % 75.13 % 53.36 % 0.10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Shin: Improving a Quality of 3D Object Detection by Spatial Transformation Mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04853 2019.
128 BirdNet+
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 59.58 % 70.84 % 54.20 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, J. Iglesias and F. García: BirdNet+: Two-Stage 3D Object Detection in LiDAR through a Sparsity-Invariant Bird’s Eye View. IEEE Access 2021.
129 SeSame-voxel code 59.36 % 76.95 % 53.14 % N/A s TITAN RTX @ 1.35 Ghz (Python)
130 SFEBEV 58.28 % 73.10 % 52.31 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
131 DMF
This method uses stereo information.
 57.99 % 71.92 % 51.55 % 0.2 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. J. Chen and W. Xu: Disparity-Based Multiscale Fusion Network for Transportation Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2022.
132 PUDet 57.77 % 72.93 % 51.03 % 0.3 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
133 PointRGBNet 57.59 % 73.09 % 51.78 % 0.08 s 4 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
P. Xie Desheng: Real-time Detection of 3D Objects Based on Multi-Sensor Information Fusion. Automotive Engineering 2022.
134 AEPF 57.14 % 70.78 % 51.33 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
135 AVOD-FPN
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 57.12 % 69.39 % 51.09 % 0.1 s Titan X (Pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
136 PiFeNet code 56.94 % 72.80 % 50.04 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Le, H. Shi, H. Rezatofighi and J. Cai: Accurate and Real-time 3D Pedestrian Detection Using an Efficient Attentive Pillar Network. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2022.
137 SCNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 56.39 % 73.73 % 49.99 % 0.04 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, H. Fu, L. Wang, L. Xiao and B. Dai: SCNet: Subdivision Coding Network for Object Detection Based on 3D Point Cloud. IEEE Access 2019.
138 PFF3D
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 55.71 % 72.67 % 49.58 % 0.05 s GPU @ 3.0 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
L. Wen and K. Jo: Fast and Accurate 3D Object Detection for Lidar-Camera-Based Autonomous Vehicles Using One Shared Voxel-Based Backbone. IEEE Access 2021.
139 MLOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 55.06 % 73.03 % 48.21 % 0.12 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Deng and K. Czarnecki: MLOD: A multi-view 3D object detection based on robust feature fusion method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04163 2019.
140 BirdNet+ (legacy)
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 52.15 % 72.45 % 46.57 % 0.1 s Titan Xp (PyTorch)
A. Barrera, C. Guindel, J. Beltrán and F. García: BirdNet+: End-to-End 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Bird’s Eye View. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
141 DSGN++
This method uses stereo information.
 code 49.37 % 68.29 % 43.79 % 0.2 s GeForce RTX 2080Ti
Y. Chen, S. Huang, S. Liu, B. Yu and J. Jia: DSGN++: Exploiting Visual-Spatial Relation for Stereo-Based 3D Detectors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2022.
142 StereoDistill 48.37 % 69.46 % 42.69 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Liu, X. Ye, X. Tan, D. Errui, Y. Zhou and X. Bai: StereoDistill: Pick the Cream from LiDAR for Distilling Stereo-based 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2023.
143 AVOD
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 code 48.15 % 64.11 % 42.37 % 0.08 s Titan X (pascal)
J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh and S. Waslander: Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation. IROS 2018.
144 SeSame-voxel w/score code 45.61 % 58.94 % 40.68 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
145 BirdNet
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 41.56 % 58.64 % 36.94 % 0.11 s Titan Xp (Caffe)
J. Beltrán, C. Guindel, F. Moreno, D. Cruzado, F. García and A. Escalera: BirdNet: A 3D Object Detection Framework from LiDAR Information. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
146 SparsePool code 40.74 % 56.52 % 36.68 % 0.13 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, W. Zhan and M. Tomizuka: Fusing bird view lidar point cloud and front view camera image for deep object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06703 2017.
147 MMLAB LIGA-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 40.60 % 58.95 % 35.27 % 0.4 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
X. Guo, S. Shi, X. Wang and H. Li: LIGA-Stereo: Learning LiDAR Geometry Aware Representations for Stereo-based 3D Detector. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2021.
148 TopNet-Retina
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 36.83 % 47.48 % 33.58 % 52ms GeForce 1080Ti (tensorflow-gpu, v1.12)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
149 CG-Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 36.25 % 55.33 % 32.17 % 0.57 s GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
C. Li, J. Ku and S. Waslander: Confidence Guided Stereo 3D Object Detection with Split Depth Estimation. IROS 2020.
150 SparsePool code 35.24 % 43.55 % 30.15 % 0.13 s 8 cores @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Wang, W. Zhan and M. Tomizuka: Fusing bird view lidar point cloud and front view camera image for deep object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.06703 2017.
151 Disp R-CNN (velo)
This method uses stereo information.
 code 27.04 % 44.19 % 23.58 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
152 Disp R-CNN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 27.04 % 44.19 % 23.58 % 0.387 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Zhang, Q. Jiang, X. Zhou and H. Bao: Disp R-CNN: Stereo 3D Object Detection via Shape Prior Guided Instance Disparity Estimation. CVPR 2020.
153 Complexer-YOLO
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 25.43 % 32.00 % 22.88 % 0.06 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (C/C++)
M. Simon, K. Amende, A. Kraus, J. Honer, T. Samann, H. Kaulbersch, S. Milz and H. Michael Gross: Complexer-YOLO: Real-Time 3D Object Detection and Tracking on Semantic Point Clouds. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops 2019.
154 DSGN
This method uses stereo information.
 code 21.04 % 31.23 % 18.93 % 0.67 s NVIDIA Tesla V100
Y. Chen, S. Liu, X. Shen and J. Jia: DSGN: Deep Stereo Geometry Network for 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
155 SeSame-pillar w/scor code 19.53 % 15.92 % 17.61 % N/A s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
156 OC Stereo
This method uses stereo information.
 code 19.23 % 32.47 % 17.11 % 0.35 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Pon, J. Ku, C. Li and S. Waslander: Object-Centric Stereo Matching for 3D Object Detection. ICRA 2020.
157 TopNet-DecayRate
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 16.00 % 23.02 % 13.24 % 92 ms NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
158 SST [st]
This method uses stereo information.
 15.20 % 26.40 % 13.47 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
159 RT3D-GMP
This method uses stereo information.
 13.92 % 20.59 % 12.74 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Königshof and C. Stiller: Learning-Based Shape Estimation with Grid Map Patches for Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2020.
160 MonoTAKD V2 11.66 % 19.68 % 10.33 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
161 MonoTAKD 11.17 % 17.98 % 9.99 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
162 MonoLTKD_V3 9.42 % 16.90 % 8.29 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
ERROR: Wrong syntax in BIBTEX file.
163 TopNet-UncEst
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 9.18 % 12.31 % 8.14 % 0.09 s NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, M. Braun, M. Lauer and C. Stiller: Capturing Object Detection Uncertainty in Multi-Layer Grid Maps. 2019.
164 ESGN
This method uses stereo information.
 9.02 % 15.78 % 7.96 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
A. Gao, Y. Pang, J. Nie, Z. Shao, J. Cao, Y. Guo and X. Li: ESGN: Efficient Stereo Geometry Network for Fast 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 2022.
165 SeSame-point w/score code 8.90 % 10.65 % 7.68 % N/A s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
166 MonoLTKD 8.25 % 13.73 % 7.01 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
167 CMKD code 8.15 % 14.66 % 7.23 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Hong, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Cross-Modality Knowledge Distillation Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
168 MonoGhost_Ped_Cycl 8.11 % 12.23 % 6.75 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
169 PS-fld code 7.29 % 12.80 % 6.05 % 0.25 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Y. Chen, H. Dai and Y. Ding: Pseudo-Stereo for Monocular 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
170 error 6.57 % 11.33 % 5.94 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
171 MonoLiG code 6.49 % 9.48 % 5.46 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
A. Hekimoglu, M. Schmidt and A. Ramiro: Monocular 3D Object Detection with LiDAR Guided Semi Supervised Active Learning. 2023.
172 TopNet-HighRes
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 6.48 % 9.99 % 6.76 % 101ms NVIDIA GeForce 1080 Ti (tensorflow-gpu)
S. Wirges, T. Fischer, C. Stiller and J. Frias: Object Detection and Classification in Occupancy Grid Maps Using Deep Convolutional Networks. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2018.
173 DA3D+KM3D+v2-99 5.82 % 9.73 % 4.88 % 0.120s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
174 MonoPSR code 5.78 % 9.87 % 4.57 % 0.2 s GPU @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Ku*, A. Pon* and S. Waslander: Monocular 3D Object Detection Leveraging Accurate Proposals and Shape Reconstruction. CVPR 2019.
175 DD3D code 5.69 % 9.20 % 5.20 % n/a s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
D. Park, R. Ambrus, V. Guizilini, J. Li and A. Gaidon: Is Pseudo-Lidar needed for Monocular 3D Object detection?. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) .
176 MonoSIM_v2 5.61 % 9.09 % 4.77 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
177 MonoLSS 5.52 % 8.88 % 4.98 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, J. Jia and Y. Shi: MonoLSS: Learnable Sample Selection For Monocular 3D Detection. International Conference on 3D Vision 2024.
178 CaDDN code 5.38 % 9.67 % 4.75 % 0.63 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Reading, A. Harakeh, J. Chae and S. Waslander: Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
179 Mix-Teaching code 5.36 % 8.56 % 4.62 % 30 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Wang, M. Zhu, C. Zhang and J. Li: Mix-Teaching: A Simple, Unified and Effective Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ArXiv 2022.
180 PS-SVDM 5.34 % 9.20 % 4.31 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
181 MonoUNI code 5.03 % 8.25 % 4.50 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Jia, Z. Li and Y. Shi: MonoUNI: A Unified Vehicle and Infrastructure-side Monocular 3D Object Detection Network with Sufficient Depth Clues. Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023.
182 MonoTRKDv2 5.01 % 9.08 % 4.21 % 40 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
183 mdab 4.97 % 8.83 % 4.74 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
184 LPCG-Monoflex code 4.90 % 8.14 % 3.86 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
L. Peng, F. Liu, Z. Yu, S. Yan, D. Deng, Z. Yang, H. Liu and D. Cai: Lidar Point Cloud Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. ECCV 2022.
185 Plane-Constraints code 4.79 % 8.67 % 3.90 % 0.05 s 4 cores @ 3.0 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, X. Chai, Y. Qiu and P. Han: Vertex points are not enough: Monocular 3D object detection via intra-and inter-plane constraints. Neural Networks 2023.
186 MonoFRD 4.55 % 8.44 % 4.14 % 0.01 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
187 MonoDDE 4.36 % 6.68 % 3.76 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Li, Z. Qu, Y. Zhou, J. Liu, H. Wang and L. Jiang: Diversity Matters: Fully Exploiting Depth Clues for Reliable Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2022.
188 MonoDTR 4.11 % 5.84 % 3.48 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
K. Huang, T. Wu, H. Su and W. Hsu: MonoDTR: Monocular 3D Object Detection with Depth-Aware Transformer. CVPR 2022.
189 RT3DStereo
This method uses stereo information.
 4.10 % 7.03 % 3.88 % 0.08 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
H. Königshof, N. Salscheider and C. Stiller: Realtime 3D Object Detection for Automated Driving Using Stereo Vision and Semantic Information. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems 2019.
190 HomoLoss(monoflex) code 4.09 % 6.81 % 3.78 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Gu, B. Wu, L. Fan, J. Huang, S. Cao, Z. Xiang and X. Hua: Homography Loss for Monocular 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022.
191 DFR-Net 4.00 % 5.99 % 3.95 % 0.18 s 1080 Ti (Pytorch)
Z. Zou, X. Ye, L. Du, X. Cheng, X. Tan, L. Zhang, J. Feng, X. Xue and E. Ding: The devil is in the task: Exploiting reciprocal appearance-localization features for monocular 3d object detection . ICCV 2021.
192 DEVIANT code 3.97 % 6.42 % 3.51 % 0.04 s 1 GPU (Python)
A. Kumar, G. Brazil, E. Corona, A. Parchami and X. Liu: DEVIANT: Depth EquiVarIAnt NeTwork for Monocular 3D Object Detection. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2022.
193 GUPNet code 3.85 % 6.94 % 3.64 % NA s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Lu, X. Ma, L. Yang, T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Q. Chu, J. Yan and W. Ouyang: Geometry Uncertainty Projection Network for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13774 2021.
194 OPA-3D code 3.75 % 6.01 % 3.56 % 0.04 s 1 core @ 3.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Su, Y. Di, G. Zhai, F. Manhardt, J. Rambach, B. Busam, D. Stricker and F. Tombari: OPA-3D: Occlusion-Aware Pixel-Wise Aggregation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2023.
195 CIE 3.74 % 6.13 % 3.18 % 0.1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Anonymities: Consistency of Implicit and Explicit Features Matters for Monocular 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07933 2022.
196 PS-SVDM 3.64 % 6.84 % 3.04 % 1 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Shi: SVDM: Single-View Diffusion Model for Pseudo-Stereo 3D Object Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02270 2023.
197 SGM3D code 3.63 % 7.05 % 3.33 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
Z. Zhou, L. Du, X. Ye, Z. Zou, X. Tan, L. Zhang, X. Xue and J. Feng: SGM3D: Stereo Guided Monocular 3D Object Detection. RA-L 2022.
198 mdab 3.38 % 6.94 % 3.21 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
199 Cube R-CNN code 3.35 % 5.01 % 3.23 % 0.05 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil, A. Kumar, J. Straub, N. Ravi, J. Johnson and G. Gkioxari: Omni3D: A Large Benchmark and Model for 3D Object Detection in the Wild. CVPR 2023.
200 Aug3D-RPN 3.33 % 5.44 % 2.82 % 0.08 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
C. He, J. Huang, X. Hua and L. Zhang: Aug3D-RPN: Improving Monocular 3D Object Detection by Synthetic Images with Virtual Depth. 2021.
201 MonOAPC 3.31 % 6.54 % 3.05 % 0035 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Yao, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wang, P. Han, X. Chai and Y. Qiu: Occlusion-Aware Plane-Constraints for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2023.
202 monodle code 3.28 % 5.34 % 2.83 % 0.04 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Ma, Y. Zhang, D. Xu, D. Zhou, S. Yi, H. Li and W. Ouyang: Delving into Localization Errors for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021 .
203 MDSNet 3.22 % 5.99 % 2.62 % 0.05 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Z. Xie, Y. Song, J. Wu, Z. Li, C. Song and Z. Xu: MDS-Net: Multi-Scale Depth Stratification 3D Object Detection from Monocular Images. Sensors 2022.
204 DDMP-3D 3.14 % 4.92 % 2.44 % 0.18 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
L. Wang, L. Du, X. Ye, Y. Fu, G. Guo, X. Xue, J. Feng and L. Zhang: Depth-conditioned Dynamic Message Propagation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
205 MonoSIM 3.05 % 5.40 % 2.60 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
206 QD-3DT
This is an online method (no batch processing).
 code 3.02 % 5.71 % 2.73 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
H. Hu, Y. Yang, T. Fischer, F. Yu, T. Darrell and M. Sun: Monocular Quasi-Dense 3D Object Tracking. ArXiv:2103.07351 2021.
207 MonoPair 2.87 % 4.76 % 2.42 % 0.06 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
Y. Chen, L. Tai, K. Sun and M. Li: MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationships. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020.
208 MonoNeRD code 2.80 % 5.24 % 2.55 % na s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
J. Xu, L. Peng, H. Cheng, H. Li, W. Qian, K. Li, W. Wang and D. Cai: MonoNeRD: NeRF-like Representations for Monocular 3D Object Detection. ICCV 2023.
209 MonoFlex 2.67 % 4.41 % 2.50 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhang, J. Lu and J. Zhou: Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2021.
210 mdab 2.63 % 4.95 % 2.65 % 22 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
211 RefinedMPL 2.42 % 4.23 % 2.14 % 0.15 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
J. Vianney, S. Aich and B. Liu: RefinedMPL: Refined Monocular PseudoLiDAR for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.09712 2019.
212 MonoRCNN++ code 2.31 % 3.50 % 2.01 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
X. Shi, Z. Chen and T. Kim: Multivariate Probabilistic Monocular 3D Object Detection. WACV 2023.
213 mdab 2.00 % 4.00 % 2.00 % 0.02 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
214 SS3D 1.89 % 3.45 % 1.44 % 48 ms Tesla V100 (Python)
E. Jörgensen, C. Zach and F. Kahl: Monocular 3D Object Detection and Box Fitting Trained End-to-End Using Intersection-over-Union Loss. CoRR 2019.
215 DA3D 1.89 % 3.46 % 1.51 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
216 D4LCN code 1.82 % 2.72 % 1.79 % 0.2 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
M. Ding, Y. Huo, H. Yi, Z. Wang, J. Shi, Z. Lu and P. Luo: Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detection. CVPR 2020.
217 PGD-FCOS3D code 1.79 % 3.54 % 1.56 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
T. Wang, X. Zhu, J. Pang and D. Lin: Probabilistic and Geometric Depth: Detecting Objects in Perspective. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2021.
218 FMF-occlusion-net 1.65 % 1.91 % 1.75 % 0.16 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Wang, F. Sun and W. Huang: Fine-grained Multi-level Fusion for Anti- occlusion Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2022.
219 MonoAuxNorm 1.65 % 3.00 % 1.37 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
220 CMAN 1.48 % 1.76 % 1.17 % 0.15 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
C. Yuanzhouhan Cao: CMAN: Leaning Global Structure Correlation for Monocular 3D Object Detection. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2022.
221 DA3D+KM3D code 1.44 % 2.88 % 1.37 % 0.02 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Jia, J. Wang, H. Pan and W. Sun: Enhancing Monocular 3-D Object Detection Through Data Augmentation Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2024.
222 MonoEF 1.18 % 2.36 % 1.15 % 0.03 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
Y. Zhou, Y. He, H. Zhu, C. Wang, H. Li and Q. Jiang: Monocular 3D Object Detection: An Extrinsic Parameter Free Approach. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
223 M3D-RPN code 0.81 % 1.25 % 0.78 % 0.16 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
G. Brazil and X. Liu: M3D-RPN: Monocular 3D Region Proposal Network for Object Detection . ICCV 2019 .
224 MonoRUn code 0.73 % 1.14 % 0.66 % 0.07 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python + C/C++)
H. Chen, Y. Huang, W. Tian, Z. Gao and L. Xiong: MonoRUn: Monocular 3D Object Detection by Reconstruction and Uncertainty Propagation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021.
225 MonoAIU 0.72 % 0.92 % 0.45 % 0.03 s GPU @ 2.5 Ghz (Python)
226 Shift R-CNN (mono) code 0.38 % 0.76 % 0.41 % 0.25 s GPU @ 1.5 Ghz (Python)
A. Naiden, V. Paunescu, G. Kim, B. Jeon and M. Leordeanu: Shift R-CNN: Deep Monocular 3D Object Detection With Closed-form Geometric Constraints. ICIP 2019.
227 f3sd code 0.01 % 0.02 % 0.01 % 1.67 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
228 mBoW
This method makes use of Velodyne laser scans.
 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 10 s 1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)
J. Behley, V. Steinhage and A. Cremers: Laser-based Segment Classification Using a Mixture of Bag-of-Words. Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2013.
Table as LaTeX | Only published Methods

Related Datasets

Citation

When using this dataset in your research, we will be happy if you cite us:
@inproceedings{Geiger2012CVPR,
  author = {Andreas Geiger and Philip Lenz and Raquel Urtasun},
  title = {Are we ready for Autonomous Driving? The KITTI Vision Benchmark Suite},
  booktitle = {Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},
  year = {2012}
}



eXTReMe Tracker