From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2].
The tables below show all of these metrics.
| Benchmark |
MOTA |
MOTP |
MODA |
MODP |
| CAR |
90.98 % |
86.50 % |
91.06 % |
89.24 % |
| Benchmark |
recall |
precision |
F1 |
TP |
FP |
FN |
FAR |
#objects |
#trajectories |
| CAR |
96.32 % |
95.94 % |
96.13 % |
38214 |
1616 |
1459 |
14.53 % |
45774 |
705 |
| Benchmark |
MT |
PT |
ML |
IDS |
FRAG |
| CAR |
87.23 % |
7.08 % |
5.69 % |
26 |
76 |
This table as LaTeX
|
[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen:
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia:
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.
