From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2].
The tables below show all of these metrics.
Benchmark |
MOTA |
MOTP |
MODA |
MODP |
CAR |
85.91 % |
85.42 % |
86.03 % |
88.28 % |
PEDESTRIAN |
54.91 % |
75.91 % |
55.11 % |
93.00 % |
Benchmark |
recall |
precision |
F1 |
TP |
FP |
FN |
FAR |
#objects |
#trajectories |
CAR |
87.89 % |
99.47 % |
93.32 % |
33574 |
180 |
4624 |
1.62 % |
37991 |
866 |
PEDESTRIAN |
58.67 % |
94.58 % |
72.42 % |
13642 |
781 |
9610 |
7.02 % |
15861 |
300 |
Benchmark |
MT |
PT |
ML |
IDS |
FRAG |
CAR |
66.77 % |
26.62 % |
6.62 % |
42 |
460 |
PEDESTRIAN |
23.02 % |
45.36 % |
31.62 % |
48 |
743 |
This table as LaTeX
|
[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen:
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia:
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.