Method

Anonymous [la] [Anonymous]
[Anonymous Submission]

Submitted on 27 Jun. 2026 08:59 by
[Anonymous Submission]

Running time:0.01 s
Environment:1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)

Method Description:
This work is being prepared for submission to a
peer-reviewed conference, and detailed methodology
will be provided after the review process.
Parameters:
input_score_3d=0.30

Latex Bibtex:

Detailed Results

From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2]. The tables below show all of these metrics.


Benchmark MOTA MOTP MODA MODP
CAR 91.96 % 87.58 % 92.02 % 90.13 %

Benchmark recall precision F1 TP FP FN FAR #objects #trajectories
CAR 93.89 % 99.10 % 96.43 % 37009 336 2408 3.02 % 41668 682

Benchmark MT PT ML IDS FRAG
CAR 84.77 % 7.23 % 8.00 % 20 44

This table as LaTeX


[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen: Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia: Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.


eXTReMe Tracker