Important note: On September 7, 2026, the KITTI and KITTI-360 servers had to be restored to the backed-up state of August 7, 2026. Results within this period have to be resubmitted.

Method

BindTrack [la] [BindTrack]


Submitted on 27 Jun. 2026 06:59 by
WD W (SIMIT)

Running time:0.01 s
Environment:1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)

Method Description:
BindTrack is a multimodal 3D multi-object tracking
framework that maintains persistent cross-modal
bindings between 3D and 2D trajectories. These
bindings provide cross-modal existence priors for
identifying temporarily missed 3D objects. A
lightweight recovery module further estimates
missing 3D states using trajectory history, point-
cloud observations, and optional 2D guidance. The
method improves tracking robustness under occlusion
and sparse LiDAR observations.
Parameters:
input_score_3d=0.30, offline=true

Latex Bibtex:
@inproceedings{wu2026bindtrack,
title={BindTrack: Binding Cross-Modal
Trajectories for Robust 3D Multi-Object Tracking},
author={Weidong Wu and others},
booktitle={Asian Conference on Computer Vision
(ACCV)},
year={2026},
note={To appear}
}

Detailed Results

From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2]. The tables below show all of these metrics.


Benchmark MOTA MOTP MODA MODP
CAR 91.96 % 87.58 % 92.02 % 90.13 %

Benchmark recall precision F1 TP FP FN FAR #objects #trajectories
CAR 93.89 % 99.10 % 96.43 % 37009 336 2408 3.02 % 41668 682

Benchmark MT PT ML IDS FRAG
CAR 84.77 % 7.23 % 8.00 % 20 44

This table as LaTeX


[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen: Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia: Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.


eXTReMe Tracker