From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2].
The tables below show all of these metrics.
| Benchmark |
MOTA |
MOTP |
MODA |
MODP |
| CAR |
82.40 % |
84.75 % |
82.82 % |
87.86 % |
| PEDESTRIAN |
37.69 % |
71.05 % |
40.68 % |
90.89 % |
| Benchmark |
recall |
precision |
F1 |
TP |
FP |
FN |
FAR |
#objects |
#trajectories |
| CAR |
91.70 % |
93.14 % |
92.42 % |
36014 |
2651 |
3259 |
23.83 % |
42683 |
1796 |
| PEDESTRIAN |
66.01 % |
72.70 % |
69.19 % |
15422 |
5790 |
7942 |
52.05 % |
25526 |
1342 |
| Benchmark |
MT |
PT |
ML |
IDS |
FRAG |
| CAR |
73.08 % |
22.92 % |
4.00 % |
143 |
385 |
| PEDESTRIAN |
34.02 % |
49.83 % |
16.15 % |
692 |
1549 |
This table as LaTeX
|
[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen:
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia:
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.