From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2].
The tables below show all of these metrics.
| Benchmark |
MOTA |
MOTP |
MODA |
MODP |
| CAR |
24.60 % |
73.89 % |
24.66 % |
86.68 % |
| PEDESTRIAN |
-10.16 % |
59.10 % |
-9.68 % |
93.86 % |
| Benchmark |
recall |
precision |
F1 |
TP |
FP |
FN |
FAR |
#objects |
#trajectories |
| CAR |
33.73 % |
86.67 % |
48.57 % |
12233 |
1881 |
24030 |
16.91 % |
14603 |
598 |
| PEDESTRIAN |
12.94 % |
37.56 % |
19.25 % |
3026 |
5031 |
20360 |
45.23 % |
8308 |
360 |
| Benchmark |
MT |
PT |
ML |
IDS |
FRAG |
| CAR |
13.23 % |
37.69 % |
49.08 % |
21 |
558 |
| PEDESTRIAN |
0.34 % |
17.18 % |
82.47 % |
112 |
630 |
This table as LaTeX
|
[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen:
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia:
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.