From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2].
The tables below show all of these metrics.
| Benchmark |
MOTA |
MOTP |
MODA |
MODP |
| CAR |
67.82 % |
84.79 % |
68.11 % |
88.83 % |
| Benchmark |
recall |
precision |
F1 |
TP |
FP |
FN |
FAR |
#objects |
#trajectories |
| CAR |
81.26 % |
88.77 % |
84.84 % |
30696 |
3885 |
7081 |
34.92 % |
41775 |
4595 |
| Benchmark |
MT |
PT |
ML |
IDS |
FRAG |
| CAR |
62.31 % |
18.92 % |
18.77 % |
100 |
715 |
This table as LaTeX
|
[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen:
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia:
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.