From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the commonly used tracking metrics CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentations [1,2].
The tables below show all of these metrics.
Benchmark |
MOTA |
MOTP |
MODA |
MODP |
CAR |
87.14 % |
82.72 % |
87.67 % |
86.36 % |
PEDESTRIAN |
60.63 % |
74.70 % |
61.13 % |
92.58 % |
Benchmark |
recall |
precision |
F1 |
TP |
FP |
FN |
FAR |
#objects |
#trajectories |
CAR |
90.26 % |
98.54 % |
94.22 % |
34562 |
511 |
3728 |
4.59 % |
40906 |
916 |
PEDESTRIAN |
66.19 % |
93.27 % |
77.43 % |
15436 |
1114 |
7885 |
10.01 % |
19227 |
315 |
Benchmark |
MT |
PT |
ML |
IDS |
FRAG |
CAR |
69.08 % |
25.69 % |
5.23 % |
183 |
486 |
PEDESTRIAN |
31.27 % |
41.58 % |
27.15 % |
115 |
764 |
This table as LaTeX
|
[1] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen:
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[2] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia:
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.