From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the HOTA tracking metrics (HOTA, DetA, AssA, DetRe, DetPr, AssRe, AssPr, LocA) [1] as well as the CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentation [2,3] metrics.
The tables below show all of these metrics. 
  
    | Benchmark | 
     HOTA | 
     DetA | 
     AssA | 
     DetRe | 
     DetPr | 
     AssRe | 
     AssPr | 
     LocA | 
    
   
    | CAR | 
     46.53 % | 
     56.69 % | 
     38.71 % | 
     62.56 % | 
     74.41 % | 
     41.26 % | 
     79.21 % | 
     81.50 % | 
    
  
  
    | Benchmark | 
     TP | 
     FP | 
     FN | 
    
   
    | CAR | 
     26323 | 
     8069 | 
     2594 | 
    
  
  
    | Benchmark | 
     MOTA | 
     MOTP | 
     MODA | 
     IDSW | 
     sMOTA | 
    
   
    | CAR | 
     66.22 % | 
     79.06 % | 
     69.00 % | 
     955 | 
     50.19 % | 
    
  
  
    | Benchmark | 
     MT rate | 
     PT rate | 
     ML rate | 
     FRAG | 
    
   
    | CAR | 
     38.31 % | 
     47.23 % | 
     14.46 % | 
     708 | 
    
  
  
    | Benchmark | 
     # Dets | 
     # Tracks | 
    
   
    | CAR | 
     28917 | 
     1315 | 
    
  
This table as LaTeX
 
  | 
[1] J. Luiten, A. Os̆ep, P. Dendorfer, P. Torr, A. Geiger, L. Leal-Taixé, B. Leibe: 
HOTA: A Higher Order Metric for Evaluating Multi-object Tracking. IJCV 2020.
[2] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen: 
Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[3] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia: 
Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.