Method

Anonymous [on] [la] [Anonymous]
[Anonymous Submission]

Submitted on 31 Oct. 2023 21:03 by
[Anonymous Submission]

Running time:0.01 s
Environment:1 core @ 2.5 Ghz (C/C++)

Method Description:
Anonymous
Parameters:
Anonymous
Latex Bibtex:
Anonymous

Detailed Results

From all 29 test sequences, our benchmark computes the HOTA tracking metrics (HOTA, DetA, AssA, DetRe, DetPr, AssRe, AssPr, LocA) [1] as well as the CLEARMOT, MT/PT/ML, identity switches, and fragmentation [2,3] metrics. The tables below show all of these metrics.


Benchmark HOTA DetA AssA DetRe DetPr AssRe AssPr LocA
CAR 81.22 % 78.34 % 84.80 % 81.95 % 87.21 % 87.40 % 91.44 % 88.08 %

Benchmark TP FP FN
CAR 31702 2690 617

Benchmark MOTA MOTP MODA IDSW sMOTA
CAR 90.34 % 86.90 % 90.38 % 16 78.26 %

Benchmark MT rate PT rate ML rate FRAG
CAR 81.54 % 10.15 % 8.31 % 432

Benchmark # Dets # Tracks
CAR 32319 610

This table as LaTeX

This figure as: png pdf

[1] J. Luiten, A. Os̆ep, P. Dendorfer, P. Torr, A. Geiger, L. Leal-Taixé, B. Leibe: HOTA: A Higher Order Metric for Evaluating Multi-object Tracking. IJCV 2020.
[2] K. Bernardin, R. Stiefelhagen: Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The CLEAR MOT Metrics. JIVP 2008.
[3] Y. Li, C. Huang, R. Nevatia: Learning to associate: HybridBoosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. CVPR 2009.


eXTReMe Tracker